The Global 200: Priority Ecoregions for Global Conservation

1.1k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2002, received 1.1k indexed citations. Written by David M. Olson and Eric Dinerstein covering the research area of Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecological Modeling. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (460 citations), Global and Planetary Change (394 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (344 citations). Published in Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/3298564 →

Countries where authors are citing The Global 200: Priority Ecoregions for Global Conservation

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Global 200: Priority Ecoregions for Global Conservation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Global 200: Priority Ecoregions for Global Conservation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Global 200: Priority Ecoregions for Global Conservation more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Global 200: Priority Ecoregions for Global Conservation

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Global 200: Priority Ecoregions for Global Conservation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Global 200: Priority Ecoregions for Global Conservation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/3298564.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026