This map shows the geographic impact of E.R. Kleemans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.R. Kleemans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.R. Kleemans more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.R. Kleemans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.R. Kleemans. The network helps show where E.R. Kleemans may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E.R. Kleemans
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E.R. Kleemans.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E.R. Kleemans based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E.R. Kleemans. E.R. Kleemans is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kruisbergen, Edwin, et al.. (2019). Georganiseerde criminaliteit in Nederland: daders, verwevenheid en opsporing. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).5 indexed citations
6.
Kruisbergen, Edwin, et al.. (2018). Georganiseerde criminaliteit en ICT. Rapportage in het kader van de vijfde ronde van de Monitor Georganiseerde Criminaliteit. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2018(8).3 indexed citations
7.
Kruisbergen, Edwin, et al.. (2018). Georganiseerde criminaliteit en ICT. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).3 indexed citations
Kleemans, E.R., et al.. (2013). Legale sector, informele praktijken. De informele kant van de legale raamprostitutie in Nederland. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 115–130.1 indexed citations
10.
Poot, C.J. de, et al.. (2009). Radicalisering en radicale groepen in vogelvlucht. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 51(4). 331–344.3 indexed citations
11.
Kruisbergen, Edwin, H.G. van de Bunt, & E.R. Kleemans. (2007). Georganiseerde criminaliteit in Nederland. Derde rapportage op basis van de Monitor Georganiseerde Criminaliteit.. 306(252).18 indexed citations
12.
Kleemans, E.R., et al.. (2007). Criminele carrières in de georganiseerde misdaad. Scientific Research and Documentation Center (WODC) (Scientific Research and Documentation Center).2 indexed citations
13.
Korf, Dirk J., E.R. Kleemans, Tom Decorte, & Tim Boekhout van Solinge. (2006). Drugs en drugshandel in Nederland en België. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 48(2). 115–130.4 indexed citations
14.
Kleemans, E.R., et al.. (2005). Kennis voor beleid. Den Haag.
15.
Kleemans, E.R.. (2003). Daders aan het woord. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 45(4).
16.
Kleemans, E.R.. (2001). Wapenhandel: terra incognita?. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 43(1). 25–26.1 indexed citations
17.
Kleemans, E.R., et al.. (1999). Korte klappen of lange halen? Wat werkt bij de aanpak van de georganiseerde criminaliteit?. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 25(6). 99–111.1 indexed citations
18.
Bunt, H.G. van de, Esther van den Berg, & E.R. Kleemans. (1999). Georganiseerde criminaliteit en het opsporingsapparaat: een wapenwedloop?. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 41(4). 395–408.1 indexed citations
19.
Bunt, H.G. van de, et al.. (1998). Georganiseerde criminaliteit in Nederland : Tweede rapportage op basis van de WODC-monitor.53 indexed citations
20.
Kleemans, E.R.. (1996). Herhaald slachtofferschap van het delict woninginbraak. University of Twente Research Information. 38(3). 232–244.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.