Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems – Part I: Lessons learned and perspectives
2013538 citationsAlexis Laurent, Ioannis Bakas et al.Waste Managementprofile →
Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems – Part II: Methodological guidance for a better practice
2014358 citationsAlexis Laurent, Julie Clavreul et al.Waste Managementprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Emmanuel Gentil
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Emmanuel Gentil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emmanuel Gentil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emmanuel Gentil more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emmanuel Gentil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emmanuel Gentil. The network helps show where Emmanuel Gentil may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emmanuel Gentil
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emmanuel Gentil.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emmanuel Gentil based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Emmanuel Gentil. Emmanuel Gentil is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Bakas, Ioannis, Julie Clavreul, Anna Bernstad Saraiva, et al.. (2018). LCA applied to solid waste management systems: A comprehensive review. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU).1 indexed citations
2.
Laurent, Alexis, Julie Clavreul, Anna Bernstad, et al.. (2014). Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems – Part II: Methodological guidance for a better practice. Waste Management. 34(3). 589–606.358 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Laurent, Alexis, Ioannis Bakas, Julie Clavreul, et al.. (2013). Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems – Part I: Lessons learned and perspectives. Waste Management. 34(3). 573–588.538 indexed citations breakdown →
Gentil, Emmanuel. (2011). Life-cycle modelling of waste management in Europe: tools, climate change and waste prevention.3 indexed citations
6.
Gentil, Emmanuel, et al.. (2010). End of life environmental assessment of micro technologies: the need for the carrot or the stick?. 143–146.1 indexed citations
Gentil, Emmanuel, Thomas H. Christensen, & Emmanuelle Aoustin. (2009). Greenhouse gas accounting and waste management. Waste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy. 27(8). 696–706.138 indexed citations
Christensen, Thomas H., Emmanuel Gentil, Alessio Boldrin, Anna Warberg Larsen, & Michael Zwicky Hauschild. (2008). Biogenic carbon accounting in LCA-modelling: Comparison of different criteria. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.