Kate Thomas

906 total citations
8 papers, 692 citations indexed

About

Kate Thomas is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Thomas has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 692 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Clinical Psychology, 4 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Kate Thomas's work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers). Kate Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers). Kate Thomas collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Belgium. Kate Thomas's co-authors include Glynn Harrison, Chris Hollis, Glyn Lewis, Jeremy Horwood, David Gunnell, Dieter Wolke, Stanley Zammit, Andrew Thompson, Emma Williams and Alan Emond and has published in prestigious journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease and Schizophrenia Research.

In The Last Decade

Kate Thomas

8 papers receiving 663 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kate Thomas United Kingdom 8 386 216 163 156 109 8 692
Erika Hohm Germany 17 441 1.1× 154 0.7× 99 0.6× 156 1.0× 75 0.7× 42 861
Johan Isaksson Sweden 17 348 0.9× 375 1.7× 259 1.6× 90 0.6× 69 0.6× 83 811
Claudia Lugo‐Candelas United States 17 561 1.5× 240 1.1× 176 1.1× 154 1.0× 112 1.0× 36 1.0k
Harriet A. Ball United Kingdom 15 390 1.0× 187 0.9× 82 0.5× 286 1.8× 91 0.8× 32 774
Larisa Duffy United Kingdom 8 369 1.0× 238 1.1× 76 0.5× 197 1.3× 60 0.6× 21 707
Liam Mahedy United Kingdom 17 542 1.4× 105 0.5× 59 0.4× 201 1.3× 96 0.9× 33 933
Tanya M. M. Button United States 15 541 1.4× 104 0.5× 69 0.4× 139 0.9× 123 1.1× 17 912
Koen Bolhuis Netherlands 16 325 0.8× 217 1.0× 164 1.0× 54 0.3× 34 0.3× 36 697
Tomas Larson Sweden 11 453 1.2× 375 1.7× 414 2.5× 102 0.7× 103 0.9× 15 892
Kirstin Greaves‐Lord Netherlands 17 425 1.1× 91 0.4× 193 1.2× 131 0.8× 126 1.2× 29 830

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Thomas. The network helps show where Kate Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Thomas. Kate Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Ambridge, Ben, Amy Bidgood, & Kate Thomas. (2020). Disentangling syntactic, semantic and pragmatic impairments in ASD: Elicited production of passives. Journal of Child Language. 48(1). 184–201. 12 indexed citations
2.
Thompson, Andrew, Sarah Sullivan, Glyn Lewis, et al.. (2011). Association between locus of control in childhood and psychotic symptoms in early adolescence: Results from a large birth cohort. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry. 16(5). 385–402. 38 indexed citations
3.
Thompson, Andrew, Sarah Sullivan, Jon Heron, et al.. (2010). Childhood facial emotion recognition and psychosis-like symptoms in a nonclinical population at 12 years of age: Results from the ALSPAC birth cohort. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry. 16(2). 136–157. 17 indexed citations
4.
Zammit, Stanley, Kate Thomas, Andrew Thompson, et al.. (2009). Maternal tobacco, cannabis and alcohol use during pregnancy and risk of adolescent psychotic symptoms in offspring. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 195(4). 294–300. 82 indexed citations
5.
Schreier, Andrea, Dieter Wolke, Kate Thomas, et al.. (2009). Prospective Study of Peer Victimization in Childhood and Psychotic Symptoms in a Nonclinical Population at Age 12 Years. Archives of General Psychiatry. 66(5). 527–527. 295 indexed citations
6.
Williams, Emma, et al.. (2008). Prevalence and characteristics of autistic spectrum disorders in the ALSPAC cohort. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 50(9). 672–677. 142 indexed citations
7.
Zammit, Stanley, Jeremy Horwood, Andrew Thompson, et al.. (2008). Investigating if psychosis-like symptoms (PLIKS) are associated with family history of schizophrenia or paternal age in the ALSPAC birth cohort. Schizophrenia Research. 104(1-3). 279–286. 56 indexed citations
8.
Thomas, Kate. (1999). Sexual Deviance: Theory, Assessment and Treatment.. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 187(2). 125–126. 50 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026