Emma Stuart
Impact in
- Communication top 5%
- Social Media and Politics
Papers in
-
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research 15
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 6
-
- Social Media and Politics 3
- Co-authors
- Mike ThelwallMeiko MakitaAmalia Más-BledaKayvan KoushaMahshid AbdoliJonathan M. LevittPaul WilsonGareth Harries
- Journals
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (5 papers)Online Information Review (4 papers)Journal of Data and Information Science (3 papers)Journal of Documentation (2 papers)Quantitative Science Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSpainAustralia
In The Last Decade
Emma Stuart
45 papers receiving 695 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Communication 169
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 29
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 126
- Information Systems and Management 85
- Health Informatics 16
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Stuart
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Stuart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Stuart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Stuart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Stuart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Stuart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Stuart. The network helps show where Emma Stuart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Stuart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 38 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 28 | |
| 19 | What are Libraries doing on Twitter | 2010 | 34 |
| 20 | Social Media Metrics | 2009 | 19 |
About Emma Stuart
Emma Stuart is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Communication, Information Systems and Management, Information Systems and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 748 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (15 papers), Web visibility and informetrics (8 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (7 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (6 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (5 papers), Web and Library Services (4 papers), Research Data Management Practices (4 papers) and Social Media and Politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (169 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (29 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (126 citations), Information Systems and Management (85 citations) and Health Informatics (16 citations). Emma Stuart has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mike Thelwall, Meiko Makita, Amalia Más-Bleda, Kayvan Kousha, Mahshid Abdoli, Jonathan M. Levitt, Paul Wilson, Gareth Harries, Iain Hrynaszkiewicz and Olga I. Goriunova. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Online Information Review, Journal of Data and Information Science, Journal of Documentation and Quantitative Science Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.