Emma Slaytor

741 total citations
10 papers, 533 citations indexed

About

Emma Slaytor is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Slaytor has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 533 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in General Health Professions, 3 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 2 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Emma Slaytor's work include Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers). Emma Slaytor is often cited by papers focused on Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers). Emma Slaytor collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Norway. Emma Slaytor's co-authors include Jeanette Ward, Elizabeth Sullivan, Richard Taylor, Stephen Morrell, Mary Ryan, M. Colleen Stainton, Sally Watts, James F. King, Paul R. Ford and Georgina Chambers and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Medical Education and The Medical Journal of Australia.

In The Last Decade

Emma Slaytor

10 papers receiving 501 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emma Slaytor Australia	9	181	151	112	94	84	10	533
Karen Chang United States	15	107 0.6×	170 1.1×	84 0.8×	94 1.0×	102 1.2×	34	718
Carolyn Johnston United States	15	79 0.4×	268 1.8×	68 0.6×	127 1.4×	264 3.1×	59	718
Kaijun Liao United States	10	110 0.6×	180 1.2×	63 0.6×	22 0.2×	83 1.0×	15	576
Maureen W. McClatchey United States	13	339 1.9×	224 1.5×	113 1.0×	23 0.2×	185 2.2×	21	814
Andrea Burón Spain	18	465 2.6×	142 0.9×	155 1.4×	56 0.6×	61 0.7×	40	885
Linda U. Krebs United States	17	406 2.2×	225 1.5×	46 0.4×	89 0.9×	205 2.4×	39	757
Christine Stone Australia	14	82 0.5×	63 0.4×	202 1.8×	86 0.9×	54 0.6×	29	716
Tami S. Rowen United States	17	69 0.4×	123 0.8×	123 1.1×	76 0.8×	171 2.0×	40	812
Holly Mead United States	14	86 0.5×	261 1.7×	39 0.3×	79 0.8×	207 2.5×	29	664
Julia V. Marley Australia	19	62 0.3×	238 1.6×	67 0.6×	133 1.4×	160 1.9×	59	850

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Slaytor

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Slaytor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Slaytor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Slaytor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Slaytor

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Slaytor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Slaytor. The network helps show where Emma Slaytor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Slaytor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Slaytor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Slaytor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Slaytor. Emma Slaytor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Haynes, Abby, Samantha Rowbotham, Anne Grunseit, et al.. (2020). Knowledge mobilisation in practice: an evaluation of the Australian Prevention Partnership Centre. Health Research Policy and Systems. 18(1). 13–13. 26 indexed citations

Slaytor, Emma, et al.. (2018). Partnering to prevent chronic disease: reflections and achievements from The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre. Public Health Research & Practice. 28(3). 9 indexed citations

Isaacs, David, et al.. (2011). Managing ethically questionable parental requests: Growth suppression and manipulation of puberty. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 47(9). 581–584. 5 indexed citations

Sullivan, Elizabeth, Jane B. Ford, Georgina Chambers, & Emma Slaytor. (2004). Maternal mortality in Australia, 1973–1996. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 44(5). 452–457. 40 indexed citations

King, James F., Emma Slaytor, & Elizabeth Sullivan. (2004). Maternal deaths in Australia, 1997–1999. The Medical Journal of Australia. 181(8). 413–414. 50 indexed citations

Ryan, Mary, et al.. (2003). Aetiology and prevalence of lower limb lymphoedema following treatment for gynaecological cancer. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 43(2). 148–151. 137 indexed citations

Sullivan, Elizabeth, et al.. (2002). A pre‐employment programme for overseas‐trained doctors entering the Australian workforce, 1997–99. Medical Education. 36(7). 614–621. 21 indexed citations

Morrell, Stephen, et al.. (1999). Urban and rural suicide differentials in migrants and the Australian-born, New South Wales, Australia 1985–1994. Social Science & Medicine. 49(1). 81–91. 57 indexed citations

Slaytor, Emma & Jeanette Ward. (1998). How risks of breast cancer and benefits of screening are communicated to women: analysis of 58 pamphlets. BMJ. 317(7153). 263–264. 132 indexed citations

10.

Taylor, Richard, Stephen Morrell, Emma Slaytor, & Paul R. Ford. (1998). Suicide in urban New South Wales, Australia 1985–1994: socio-economic and migrant interactions. Social Science & Medicine. 47(11). 1677–1686. 56 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact