Emma Pomeroy

2.2k citations
49 papers · 852 indexed · h-index 16

Emma Pomeroy

45 papers receiving 824 citations

Peers

Emma Pomeroy
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Archeology 245
  • Paleontology 137
  • Anthropology 177
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 174
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 116
Replace Elżbieta Żądzińska with:
Elżbieta Żądzińska Poland
Mark Sorensen United States
Emőke J. E. Szathmáry Canada
Martine Vercauteren Belgium
Rachel Ives United Kingdom
Francesca Gandini Italy
Marta Krenz‐Niedbała Poland
Chaoying Cui China
Jørgen Lange Thomsen Denmark
Jodi Lynn Barta United States
Emma Pomeroy relative to Elżbieta Żądzińska Poland Elżbieta Żądzińska's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Elżbieta Żądzińska · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Pomeroy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Pomeroy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Pomeroy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Pomeroy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Pomeroy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Pomeroy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Pomeroy. The network helps show where Emma Pomeroy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Pomeroy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Pomeroy Line = papers co-authored together Emma Pomeroy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20235
3 202220
4 20224
5 20215
6 202114
7 202125
8 20211
9 201936
10 201810
11 201814
12 201740
13 201699
14 201412
15 201295
16 201149
17 200916
18 200839
19
Analysis of longitudinal cervical spinal mobility measures over a 32 year period indicates that AS is a progressive disease with clear cut gender differences
20070
20
Lipid bioprofiles and correlation with disease activity measures in the' spondyloarthropathies
20075

About Emma Pomeroy

Emma Pomeroy is a scholar working on Archeology, Paleontology, Anthropology, Archeology and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 49 papers that have together received 852 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (18 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (14 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (12 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (10 papers), Paleopathology and ancient diseases (9 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (4 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (245 citations), Paleontology (137 citations), Anthropology (177 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (174 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (116 citations). Emma Pomeroy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jay T. Stock, Jonathan C. K. Wells, Tim Cole, J. Jaime Miranda, Sanja Stanojevic, Sonia Zakrzewski, Chittaranjan S. Yajnik, Barry M. Popkin, Subhash R. Walimbe and Chris Hunt. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physical Anthropology, American Journal of Human Biology, Scientific Reports, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences and Quaternary International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026