Emma Plugge

3.1k citations
96 papers · 2.1k indexed · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Plugge

95 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Emma Plugge
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Clinical Psychology 742
  • General Health Professions 655
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 438
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 591
  • Health 159
Replace Heather Sipsma with:
Heather Sipsma United States
Anette Agardh Sweden
Saba W. Masho United States
Cathrine Fowler Australia
Charles Opondo United Kingdom
Bonnie D. Kerker United States
David Teye Doku Ghana
Berihun Assefa Dachew Ethiopia
Katherine Sorsdahl South Africa
Sônia Silva Marcon Brazil
Emma Plugge relative to Heather Sipsma United States Heather Sipsma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Heather Sipsma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Plugge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Plugge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Plugge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Plugge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Plugge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Plugge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Plugge. The network helps show where Emma Plugge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Plugge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Plugge Line = papers co-authored together Emma Plugge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012157
2 2012144
3 2016140
4 2016137
5 200983
6 202162
7 200559
8 201858
9 201854
10
The Health of Women in Prison Study Findings
200653
11 201051
12 200951
13 201648
14 200843
15 201542
16 200539
17 201837
18 201136
19 200935
20 200934

About Emma Plugge

Emma Plugge is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Epidemiology, having authored 96 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (30 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (18 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (13 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (12 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (9 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (7 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers) and Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (742 citations), General Health Professions (655 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (438 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (591 citations) and Health (159 citations). Emma Plugge has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Thailand and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Ray Fitzpatrick, Nicola Douglas, Marian Knight, Gracia Fellmeth, Mina Fazel, Charlie Foster, Helen Doll, Éamonn O’Moore, Katharine Herbert and P Yudkin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Public Health, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, Public Health, BMJ Open and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact