Emma Morton
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment 21
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 2
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 8
- Co-authors
- Erin E. Michalak (34 shared papers)Greg Murray (14 shared papers)Steven J. Barnes (12 shared papers)Kathryn E. Moracco (1 shared paper)John D. Butts (1 shared paper)Carol W. Runyan (1 shared paper)Rachelle Hole (8 shared papers)Simone Buzwell (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Affective Disorders (10 papers)JMIR Mental Health (4 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (3 papers)Bipolar Disorders (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Emma Morton
43 papers receiving 582 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Applied Psychology 106
- Psychiatry and Mental health 156
- Health 58
- Clinical Psychology 151
- Biological Psychiatry 13
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Morton
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Morton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Morton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Morton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Morton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Morton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Morton. The network helps show where Emma Morton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Morton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 81 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 11 |
About Emma Morton
Emma Morton is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Pharmacology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (21 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (8 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (3 papers), Restless Legs Syndrome Research (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (106 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (156 citations), Health (58 citations), Clinical Psychology (151 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (13 citations). Emma Morton has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Erin E. Michalak, Greg Murray, Steven J. Barnes, Kathryn E. Moracco, John D. Butts, Carol W. Runyan, Rachelle Hole, Simone Buzwell, Heather L. O'Brien and Josh Woolley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, JMIR Mental Health, PLoS ONE, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry and Bipolar Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.