Emma Maund
Impact in
-
- Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Treatment of Major Depression
Papers in
-
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance 2
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 3
- Co-authors
- Catriona McDaidKath WrightNerys WoolacottB. JenkinsStephen RicePeter C GøtzscheJeppe Bennekou SchrollTony Kendrick
- Journals
- Health Technology Assessment (4 papers)BMJ (3 papers)Journal of Affective Disorders (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)BMJ Open (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomDenmarkAustria
In The Last Decade
Emma Maund
24 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 258
- Pharmacology 234
- Surgery 566
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 181
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 31
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Maund
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Maund's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Maund with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Maund more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Maund
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Maund. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Maund. The network helps show where Emma Maund may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Maund, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 52 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 56 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 48 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 54 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 45 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 185 | |
| 17 | Quality assessment checklist | 2012 | 1 |
| 18 | Paracetamol and selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the reduction in morphine-related side-effects after major surgery: a systematic review Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 362 |
| 19 | 2011 | 22 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 25 |
About Emma Maund
Emma Maund is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology and Social Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (2 papers) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (258 citations), Pharmacology (234 citations), Surgery (566 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (181 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (31 citations). Emma Maund has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Catriona McDaid, Kath Wright, Nerys Woolacott, B. Jenkins, Stephen Rice, Peter C Gøtzsche, Jeppe Bennekou Schroll, Tony Kendrick, Adam W A Geraghty and Stephen Brealey. Their work appears in journals such as Health Technology Assessment, BMJ, Journal of Affective Disorders, PLoS ONE and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.