Britta Tendal
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Surgery top 10%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Asbjørn HróbjartssonJørgen HildenJens AndresenDitte ErngaardJesper HjortdalPer FlesnerLine KesselStig Brorson
- Topics
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (8 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers)Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- DenmarkAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Britta Tendal
36 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
- Ophthalmology 643
- Pharmacology 484
- Surgery 451
- Epidemiology 426
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 385
Countries citing papers authored by Britta Tendal
This map shows the geographic impact of Britta Tendal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Britta Tendal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Britta Tendal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Britta Tendal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Britta Tendal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Britta Tendal. The network helps show where Britta Tendal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Britta Tendal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Britta Tendal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Britta Tendal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Britta Tendal. Britta Tendal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 56 | |
| 5 | 177 | |
| 6 | 111 | |
| 7 | Pain relief that matters to patients: systematic review of empirical studies assessing the minimum clinically important difference in acute painbreakdown → | 293 |
| 8 | 111 | |
| 9 | 44 | |
| 10 | 242 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 85 | |
| 13 | 198 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 315 | |
| 16 | 41 | |
| 17 | Effects of glucosamine, chondroitin, or placebo in patients with osteoarthritis of hip or knee: network meta-analysisbreakdown → | 396 |
| 18 | 61 | |
| 19 | 54 | |
| 20 | 164 |
About Britta Tendal
Britta Tendal is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Ophthalmology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 36 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (8 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (643 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (385 citations) and Pharmacology (484 citations). Britta Tendal has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Jørgen Hilden, Jens Andresen, Ditte Erngaard, Jesper Hjortdal, Per Flesner, Line Kessel, Stig Brorson, Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen and Philippe Ravaud. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, PLoS ONE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.