Emma L. Lane
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Neurology top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stephen B. DunnettGaynor A. SmithPatrik BrundinM. Angela CenciChristian WinklerAndreas HeuerSharon C. CheethamAnne Rosser
- Topics
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (42 papers)Nerve injury and regeneration (23 papers)Neurological disorders and treatments (21 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific ReportsInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenUnited States
In The Last Decade
Emma L. Lane
54 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 682
- Neurology 603
- Molecular Biology 297
- Developmental Neuroscience 137
- Cognitive Neuroscience 134
Countries citing papers authored by Emma L. Lane
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma L. Lane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma L. Lane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma L. Lane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma L. Lane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma L. Lane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma L. Lane. The network helps show where Emma L. Lane may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma L. Lane
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma L. Lane. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma L. Lane based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma L. Lane. Emma L. Lane is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 61 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 88 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 51 | |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | 35 | |
| 19 | 38 | |
| 20 | 60 |
About Emma L. Lane
Emma L. Lane is a scholar working on Neurology, Developmental Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (42 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (23 papers) and Neurological disorders and treatments (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (603 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (682 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (137 citations). Emma L. Lane has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen B. Dunnett, Gaynor A. Smith, Patrik Brundin, M. Angela Cenci, Christian Winkler, Andreas Heuer, Sharon C. Cheetham, Anne Rosser, Peter Jenner and Mariah J. Lelos. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.