Emma K. Reid
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 0.5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Andrea C. TriccoLun LiRafael Sarkis‐OnofreMargaret SampsonJennifer TetzlaffFerrán Catalá-LópezDavid MoherLarissa Shamseer
- Topics
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (7 papers)Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (3 papers)Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Emma K. Reid
8 papers receiving 531 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 338
- General Health Professions 144
- Sociology and Political Science 108
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 104
- Economics and Econometrics 67
Countries citing papers authored by Emma K. Reid
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma K. Reid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma K. Reid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma K. Reid more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma K. Reid
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma K. Reid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma K. Reid. The network helps show where Emma K. Reid may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma K. Reid
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma K. Reid. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma K. Reid based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma K. Reid. Emma K. Reid is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Studybreakdown → | 476 |
| 9 | 16 |
About Emma K. Reid
Emma K. Reid is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Health Informatics and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (7 papers), Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (3 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (338 citations), Health Informatics (10 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (27 citations). Emma K. Reid has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Andrea C. Tricco, Lun Li, Rafael Sarkis‐Onofre, Margaret Sampson, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Ferrán Catalá-López, David Moher, Larissa Shamseer, Douglas G. Altman and Matthew J. Page. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS Medicine, BMC Medical Research Methodology and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.