Emma Jones
- Clinical Psychology
- Education top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Health Professions
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- John GaventaLeigh SpannerGareth HughesLiz BrewsterMichael PriestleyEilidh CageRajvinder SamraMathijs Lucassen
- Topics
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations (17 papers)Law in Society and Culture (5 papers)Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Clinical PsychologyLawEducation
- Journals
- The LancetSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIraqHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Emma Jones
26 papers receiving 294 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Clinical Psychology 96
- Education 86
- Sociology and Political Science 84
- General Health Professions 74
- Social Psychology 58
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Jones. The network helps show where Emma Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Jones. Emma Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 43 | |
| 6 | The rule of lawyers: Applying therapeutic jurisprudence at the intersections of wellbeing, disciplinary proceedings and professionalism | 2 |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 66 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | Making practice more affective: Emotional intelligence as a legal meta-competency | 4 |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | Hilary Sommerlad, Sonia Harris-Short, Steven Vaughan and Richard Young (Eds) The futures of legal education and the legal profession | 1 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Emma Jones
Emma Jones is a scholar working on Law, Pharmacy and Finance, having authored 29 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal Education and Practice Innovations (17 papers), Law in Society and Culture (5 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (96 citations), Law (36 citations) and Education (86 citations). Emma Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Iraq and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include John Gaventa, Leigh Spanner, Gareth Hughes, Liz Brewster, Michael Priestley, Eilidh Cage, Rajvinder Samra, Mathijs Lucassen, Peter Toon and Masoud Muhammed Hassan. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.