Leigh Spanner

481 total citations
8 papers, 245 citations indexed

About

Leigh Spanner is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Leigh Spanner has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 245 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Clinical Psychology and 4 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Leigh Spanner's work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (5 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers) and Higher Education Practises and Engagement (2 papers). Leigh Spanner is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (5 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers) and Higher Education Practises and Engagement (2 papers). Leigh Spanner collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Leigh Spanner's co-authors include Gareth Hughes, Michael Priestley, Emma Jones, Liz Brewster, Emma Broglia, Eilidh Cage and Angela Hall and has published in prestigious journals such as Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Journal of Further and Higher Education and Education Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Leigh Spanner

8 papers receiving 229 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Leigh Spanner United Kingdom	5	124	84	83	71	25	8	245
Bonnie Horgos United States	8	206 1.7×	80 1.0×	104 1.3×	82 1.2×	24 1.0×	13	312
Burhan Çapri Türkiye	10	109 0.9×	114 1.4×	63 0.8×	109 1.5×	14 0.6×	33	289
Michelle Trotter-Mathison United States	7	132 1.1×	89 1.1×	61 0.7×	57 0.8×	24 1.0×	12	257
Henry D. Mason South Africa	9	139 1.1×	144 1.7×	68 0.8×	52 0.7×	29 1.2×	37	270
Oihane Fernández-Lasarte Spain	9	136 1.1×	151 1.8×	36 0.4×	118 1.7×	27 1.1×	15	291
Ola Demkowicz United Kingdom	9	134 1.1×	34 0.4×	44 0.5×	65 0.9×	15 0.6×	35	195
Denisse Manrique‐Millones Peru	10	109 0.9×	73 0.9×	27 0.3×	64 0.9×	20 0.8×	25	194
Farzana Ashraf Pakistan	10	126 1.0×	52 0.6×	42 0.5×	30 0.4×	36 1.4×	36	227
Anna Salza Italy	8	198 1.6×	50 0.6×	79 1.0×	23 0.3×	33 1.3×	13	263
Zanariah Ismail Malaysia	9	195 1.6×	92 1.1×	59 0.7×	26 0.4×	41 1.6×	27	303

Countries citing papers authored by Leigh Spanner

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leigh Spanner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leigh Spanner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leigh Spanner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leigh Spanner

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leigh Spanner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leigh Spanner. The network helps show where Leigh Spanner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leigh Spanner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leigh Spanner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leigh Spanner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leigh Spanner. Leigh Spanner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Hughes, Gareth, Michael Priestley, & Leigh Spanner. (2024). Stretched at Both Ends: Pressure on Student Services and the Impact on Academic Staff at UK Universities. Education Sciences. 15(1). 13–13. 1 indexed citations

2.

Jones, Emma, Liz Brewster, Michael Priestley, et al.. (2024). Inclusion or Isolation? Differential Student Experiences of Independent Learning and Wellbeing in Higher Education. Education Sciences. 14(3). 285–285. 2 indexed citations

3.

Priestley, Michael, et al.. (2022). Student perceptions and proposals for promoting wellbeing through social relationships at university. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 46(9). 1243–1256. 19 indexed citations

4.

Hughes, Gareth, et al.. (2022). The role of student peers in HE student mental health and well-being. Mental Health and Social Inclusion. 28(3). 195–207. 4 indexed citations

5.

Brewster, Liz, et al.. (2021). ‘Look after the staff and they would look after the students’ cultures of wellbeing and mental health in the university setting. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 46(4). 548–560. 43 indexed citations

6.

Priestley, Michael, Emma Broglia, Gareth Hughes, & Leigh Spanner. (2021). Student Perspectives on improving mental health support Services at university. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 22(1). 54 indexed citations

7.

Cage, Eilidh, et al.. (2021). Student mental health and transitions into, through and out of university: student and staff perspectives. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 45(8). 1076–1089. 66 indexed citations

8.

Jones, Emma, et al.. (2020). Student wellbeing and assessment in higher education: the balancing act. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 46(3). 438–450. 56 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact