Emma Irvin
- Pharmacology top 0.2%
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology top 0.2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Medical Laboratory Technology top 0.1%
- Co-authors
- Dwayne Van EerdQuenby MahoodKimberley CullenJudy ClarkeSandra SinclairJohn FrankRenée‐Louise FrancheJaime Guzmán
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (20 papers)Workplace Health and Well-being (15 papers)Occupational Health and Safety Research (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Emma Irvin
33 papers receiving 3.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 172
- Pharmacology 1.9k
- General Health Professions 1.4k
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 765
- Social Psychology 648
- Medical Laboratory Technology 419
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Irvin
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Irvin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Irvin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Irvin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Irvin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Irvin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Irvin. The network helps show where Emma Irvin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Irvin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Irvin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Irvin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Irvin. Emma Irvin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Effectiveness of Workplace Interventions in Return-to-Work for Musculoskeletal, Pain-Related and Mental Health Conditions: An Update of the Evidence and Messages for Practitionersbreakdown → | 295 |
| 5 | 130 | |
| 6 | 30 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 247 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 69 | |
| 11 | 133 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 129 | |
| 14 | 68 | |
| 15 | 80 | |
| 16 | 107 | |
| 17 | Workplace-Based Return-to-Work Interventions: A Systematic Review of the Quantitative Literaturebreakdown → | 548 |
| 18 | 258 | |
| 19 | 110 | |
| 20 | 93 |
About Emma Irvin
Emma Irvin is a scholar working on Medical Laboratory Technology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Pharmacology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (20 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (15 papers) and Occupational Health and Safety Research (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (419 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (765 citations) and Pharmacology (1.9k citations). Emma Irvin has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Dwayne Van Eerd, Quenby Mahood, Kimberley Cullen, Judy Clarke, Sandra Sinclair, John Frank, Renée‐Louise Franche, Jaime Guzmán, Shelley Brewer and Donald C. Cole. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Spine and Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.