Emma Collier‐Baker

911 citations
16 papers · 481 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Collier‐Baker

16 papers receiving 467 citations

Peers

Emma Collier‐Baker
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 257
  • Developmental Biology 39
  • Social Psychology 267
  • Cultural Studies 50
  • Small Animals 43
Replace James E. Reaux with:
James E. Reaux United States
Ágnes Erdőhegyi Hungary
Martin Schmelz Germany
Nicholas J. Mulcahy Australia
Donna T. Bierschwale United States
Kristin Andrews Canada
Heidi Lyn United States
Christoph J. Völter Austria
H. Lyn Miles United States
Jane Goodall United States
Emma Collier‐Baker relative to James E. Reaux United States James E. Reaux's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
James E. Reaux · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Collier‐Baker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Collier‐Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Collier‐Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Collier‐Baker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Collier‐Baker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Collier‐Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Collier‐Baker. The network helps show where Emma Collier‐Baker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Emma Collier‐Baker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Collier‐Baker Line = papers co-authored together Emma Collier‐Baker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 200473
2 200956
3 201844
4 200644
5 201143
6 201840
7 201440
8 200532
9 200431
10 201128
11 201523
12 201412
13 20146
14 20155
15
Do chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) understand invisible displacement
20043
16
KONTRIBUSI PEROLEHAN THEORY OF MIND TERHADAP PERKEMBANGAN MENTAL TIME TRAVEL PADA ANAK USIA 3-5 TAHUN
20151

About Emma Collier‐Baker

Emma Collier‐Baker is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science and Cultural Studies, having authored 16 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (12 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (8 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (3 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers), Language and cultural evolution (2 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (257 citations), Developmental Biology (39 citations), Social Psychology (267 citations), Cultural Studies (50 citations) and Small Animals (43 citations). Emma Collier‐Baker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, South Africa and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Suddendorf, Mark Nielsen, Andrew Hill, Matti Wilks, Marie Schäfer, Sean Sloan, Christian J. Rapold, Mohammed Alamgir, Mason J. Campbell and Graham Usher. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of comparative psychology, Animal Cognition, Nature Communications, Folia Primatologica and Land Use Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact