Jane Goodall

1.0k total citations
13 papers, 617 citations indexed

About

Jane Goodall is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Goodall has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 617 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Social Psychology, 2 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Jane Goodall's work include Primate Behavior and Ecology (5 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers). Jane Goodall is often cited by papers focused on Primate Behavior and Ecology (5 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers). Jane Goodall collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Jane Goodall's co-authors include Stephen R. Ross, Carolyn Johnston, Anne‐Marie Slowther, Tony Hope, Tetsuro Matsuzawa, Elizabeth V. Lonsdorf, Roger S. Fouts, Lydia M. Hopper, Eric V. Lonsdorf and Robert W. Shumaker and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Alternatives to Laboratory Animals.

In The Last Decade

Jane Goodall

12 papers receiving 528 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jane Goodall United States	9	389	142	128	126	111	13	617
Rachael Miller United Kingdom	16	322 0.8×	101 0.7×	216 1.7×	137 1.1×	59 0.5×	49	743
Linda D. Wolfe United States	17	522 1.3×	180 1.3×	244 1.9×	37 0.3×	144 1.3×	46	978
Jordi Sabater i Pi Spain	11	331 0.9×	147 1.0×	144 1.1×	62 0.5×	57 0.5×	19	455
Frank E. Poirier United States	13	617 1.6×	208 1.5×	236 1.8×	180 1.4×	107 1.0×	26	1.1k
Gerald C. Ruppenthal United States	17	565 1.5×	112 0.8×	127 1.0×	125 1.0×	110 1.0×	29	951
Barbara J. King United States	14	538 1.4×	215 1.5×	144 1.1×	252 2.0×	85 0.8×	31	953
Jeffrey A. Kurland United States	17	598 1.5×	203 1.4×	379 3.0×	65 0.5×	74 0.7×	27	946
Cristina Gomes United States	12	368 0.9×	75 0.5×	138 1.1×	56 0.4×	47 0.4×	24	633
Neil Chalmers United Kingdom	15	518 1.3×	190 1.3×	319 2.5×	82 0.7×	45 0.4×	31	760
Cláudia Sousa Portugal	15	809 2.1×	316 2.2×	212 1.7×	228 1.8×	149 1.3×	25	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Goodall

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Goodall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Goodall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Goodall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Goodall

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Goodall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Goodall. The network helps show where Jane Goodall may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Goodall

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Goodall. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Goodall based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Goodall. Jane Goodall is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Hopper, Lydia M., Stephen R. Ross, & Jane Goodall. (2021). Chimpanzees in Context : A Comparative Perspective on Chimpanzee Behavior, Cognition, Conservation, and Welfare. 19 indexed citations

2.

Lonsdorf, Elizabeth V., Stephen R. Ross, Tetsuro Matsuzawa, & Jane Goodall. (2010). The Mind of the Chimpanzee. 60 indexed citations

3.

Lukas, Kristen E., Eric V. Lonsdorf, Tara S. Stoinski, et al.. (2008). Inappropriate Use and Portrayal of Chimpanzees. Science. 319(5869). 1487–1487. 32 indexed citations

4.

Goodall, Jane. (2005). Clinical ethics committees. Medicine. 33(2). 1–2. 1 indexed citations

5.

Goodall, Jane, et al.. (2005). Further reading and web resources. Medicine. 33(2). 25–25. 4 indexed citations

6.

Slowther, Anne‐Marie, Carolyn Johnston, Jane Goodall, & Tony Hope. (2004). Development of clinical ethics committees. BMJ. 328(7445). 950–952. 59 indexed citations

7.

Bekoff, Marc & Jane Goodall. (2001). The view from Japan. Nature. 411(6841). 995–996. 2 indexed citations

8.

Goodall, Jane. (1998). ESSAYS ON SCIENCE AND SOCIETY: Learning from the Chimpanzees: A Message Humans Can Understand. Science. 282(5397). 2184–2185. 15 indexed citations

9.

Fouts, Roger S., et al.. (1998). Next of Kin: My Conversations with Chimpanzees. Dominican Scholar (Dominican University of California). 38 indexed citations

10.

Goodall, Jane. (1995). Why is it Unethical to use Chimpanzees in the Laboratory?. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 23(5). 615–620. 5 indexed citations

11.

Goodall, Jane. (1991). Through a Window: Thirty Years with the Chimpanzees of Gombe. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 19 indexed citations

12.

Goodall, Jane. (1964). Tool-Using and Aimed Throwing in a Community of Free-Living Chimpanzees. Nature. 201(4926). 1264–1266. 296 indexed citations

13.

Goodall, Jane. (1963). Feeding behaviour of wild chimpanzees : A preliminary report. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 10. 39–48. 67 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact