Emma Clark

4.4k total citations
100 papers, 2.9k citations indexed

About

Emma Clark is a scholar working on Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Clark has authored 100 papers receiving a total of 2.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 42 papers in Surgery, 34 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and 21 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Emma Clark's work include Bone health and osteoporosis research (34 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (19 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (13 papers). Emma Clark is often cited by papers focused on Bone health and osteoporosis research (34 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (19 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (13 papers). Emma Clark collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Emma Clark's co-authors include Jonathan H. Tobias, Andy Ness, Nicholas Bishop, Shea Palmer, Kevin Deere, Jacqui Clinch, Alex J. MacGregor, Paul Dieppe, Ashley Blom and Andrew Judge and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and PEDIATRICS.

In The Last Decade

Emma Clark

94 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma Clark United Kingdom 27 1.2k 1.1k 451 448 404 100 2.9k
Claudie Berger Canada 30 1.2k 1.0× 2.0k 1.8× 583 1.3× 330 0.7× 155 0.4× 65 3.6k
Henrik L. Jørgensen Denmark 37 1.3k 1.0× 766 0.7× 374 0.8× 263 0.6× 280 0.7× 149 4.0k
Ragnar M. Joakimsen Norway 36 680 0.6× 1.6k 1.5× 585 1.3× 317 0.7× 194 0.5× 86 3.5k
George Ioannidis Canada 33 1.5k 1.2× 2.3k 2.1× 643 1.4× 355 0.8× 133 0.3× 166 4.3k
Jordan B. Renner United States 42 2.7k 2.2× 968 0.9× 406 0.9× 298 0.7× 237 0.6× 196 6.3k
Susan K. Ewing United States 32 891 0.7× 1.7k 1.6× 1.3k 2.9× 405 0.9× 170 0.4× 61 4.6k
Patricia Dargent‐Molina France 33 1.9k 1.6× 3.0k 2.8× 981 2.2× 672 1.5× 171 0.4× 71 5.5k
Kimberly Y.Z. Forrest United States 26 462 0.4× 410 0.4× 596 1.3× 278 0.6× 321 0.8× 35 3.1k
Kristina Åkesson Sweden 41 2.2k 1.8× 2.9k 2.7× 641 1.4× 647 1.4× 272 0.7× 176 6.0k
Björn E. Rosengren Sweden 30 1.1k 0.9× 1.3k 1.2× 606 1.3× 390 0.9× 56 0.1× 136 2.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Clark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Clark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Clark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Clark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Clark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Clark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Clark. The network helps show where Emma Clark may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Clark

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Clark. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Clark based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Clark. Emma Clark is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Duffy, Fiona, et al.. (2025). Clinicians' Experiences of Eating Disorder Focused Family Therapy With Autistic Young People. European Eating Disorders Review. 33(4). 637–646. 2 indexed citations
3.
Toyé, Francine, Karen Barker, Sarah Drew, Tanzeela Khalid, & Emma Clark. (2025). A reflexive thematic analysis of existential losses in men with osteoporosis: “I’m not the person I was somehow … although I am”. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 26(1). 294–294.
4.
Barker, Karen, Francine Toyé, Sarah Drew, Tanzeela Khalid, & Emma Clark. (2024). Applicability of Vfrac in men: a qualitative study of an osteoporotic vertebral fracture screening tool for use in older people with back pain. Archives of Osteoporosis. 19(1). 117–117. 1 indexed citations
6.
Bullock, Laurna, Ashley Hawarden, Jane Fleming, et al.. (2024). Exploring practice and perspectives on shared decision-making about osteoporosis medicines in Fracture Liaison Services: the iFraP development qualitative study. Archives of Osteoporosis. 19(1). 50–50. 3 indexed citations
9.
Szilagyi, Peter G., O. Kenrik Duru, Alejandra Casillas, et al.. (2024). Text vs Patient Portal Messaging to Improve Influenza Vaccination Coverage. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184(5). 519–519. 4 indexed citations
10.
Jamaludin, Amir, Jeremy Fairbank, Ian Harding, et al.. (2023). Automated measurement of size of spinal curve in population-based cohorts: Validation of a method based on total body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. Bone. 172. 116775–116775. 1 indexed citations
11.
Bullock, Laurna, Jane Fleming, Sarah Leyland, et al.. (2023). Variation in UK fracture liaison service consultation conduct and content before and during the COVID pandemic: results from the iFraP-D UK survey. Archives of Osteoporosis. 19(1). 5–5. 3 indexed citations
12.
Poole, Kenneth, Emma Clark, Jane Fleming, et al.. (2022). PHOENIX (Picking up Hidden Osteoporosis Effectively during Normal CT Imaging without additional X-rays): protocol for a randomised, multicentre feasibility study. BMJ Open. 12(5). e050343–e050343. 2 indexed citations
13.
Manns, Sarah, Fiona Cramp, Rachel Lewis, Emma Clark, & Shea Palmer. (2018). A qualitative evaluation of the appropriateness, validity, acceptability, feasibility and interpretability of the Bristol Impact of Hypermobility (BIoH) questionnaire. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 38. 69–76. 6 indexed citations
14.
Elhakeem, Ahmed, April Hartley, Yun Luo, et al.. (2018). Lean mass and lower limb muscle function in relation to hip strength, geometry and fracture risk indices in community-dwelling older women. Osteoporosis International. 30(1). 211–220. 34 indexed citations
15.
Kim, Jiwon, et al.. (2016). Real-time information system for spreading rail passengers across train carriages: agent-based simulation study. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 8 indexed citations
16.
Clark, Emma. (2014). The Epidemiology of Fractures in Otherwise Healthy Children. Current Osteoporosis Reports. 12(3). 272–278. 59 indexed citations
17.
Taylor, Hilary, et al.. (2013). Identifying Scoliosis in Population-Based Cohorts: Development and Validation of a Novel Method Based on Total-Body Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometric Scans. Calcified Tissue International. 92(6). 539–547. 10 indexed citations
18.
Clark, Emma, Virginia C. Gould, Leigh Morrison, Tahir Masud, & Jonathan H. Tobias. (2011). Determinants of fracture risk in a UK-population-based cohort of older women: a cross-sectional analysis of the Cohort for Skeletal Health in Bristol and Avon (COSHIBA). Age and Ageing. 41(1). 46–52. 17 indexed citations
19.
Clark, Emma, Andy Ness, & Jonathan H. Tobias. (2005). BSR/BATS Joint Session [OP13-OP18]. British journal of rheumatology. 44(suppl_1). i6–i8. 5 indexed citations
20.
Sleep, Jennifer & Emma Clark. (1993). Major new survey to identify and prioritise research issues for midwifery practice.. PubMed. 106(1265). 217–8. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026