Emma Borg

1.3k total citations
42 papers, 466 citations indexed

About

Emma Borg is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Borg has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 466 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Philosophy, 10 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 10 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Emma Borg's work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers). Emma Borg is often cited by papers focused on Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers). Emma Borg collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Emma Borg's co-authors include Tim V. Salomons, Richard Harrison, Brad Hooker, Nat Hansen, Paul Horwich, Wiebke Gandhi, Paul Noordhof, John Brazier, Cicely Kerr and Bhismadev Chakrabarti and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Quality of Life Research and The Philosophical Review.

In The Last Decade

Emma Borg

35 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma Borg United Kingdom 10 261 197 194 105 77 42 466
Anne Bezuidenhout United States 13 334 1.3× 241 1.2× 266 1.4× 55 0.5× 71 0.9× 29 514
Jane Heal United Kingdom 15 276 1.1× 289 1.5× 63 0.3× 158 1.5× 52 0.7× 47 542
Mitchell S. Green United States 11 210 0.8× 235 1.2× 123 0.6× 112 1.1× 61 0.8× 22 426
Gregory McCulloch United Kingdom 10 235 0.9× 200 1.0× 44 0.2× 180 1.7× 31 0.4× 26 460
Gerhard Preyer Germany 8 167 0.6× 160 0.8× 61 0.3× 62 0.6× 38 0.5× 51 345
Heikki Nyman United Kingdom 4 164 0.6× 223 1.1× 44 0.2× 89 0.8× 24 0.3× 10 458
Maximilian A. E. Aue United Kingdom 3 161 0.6× 217 1.1× 43 0.2× 89 0.8× 23 0.3× 5 444
Stefano Predelli United Kingdom 15 488 1.9× 382 1.9× 257 1.3× 61 0.6× 180 2.3× 62 739
Isabel Orenes Spain 10 133 0.5× 48 0.2× 43 0.2× 153 1.5× 115 1.5× 18 375
G. H. von Wright Finland 5 186 0.7× 260 1.3× 43 0.2× 90 0.9× 37 0.5× 11 516

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Borg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Borg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Borg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Borg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Borg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Borg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Borg. The network helps show where Emma Borg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Borg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Borg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Borg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Borg. Emma Borg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Borg, Emma. (2025). LLMs, Turing tests and Chinese rooms: the prospects for meaning in large language models. Inquiry. 1–31. 1 indexed citations
2.
Borg, Emma. (2024). Acting for Reasons.
3.
Lepoutre, Maxime, et al.. (2023). What is Hate Speech? The Case for a Corpus Approach. Criminal Law and Philosophy. 18(2). 397–430. 4 indexed citations
5.
Salomons, Tim V., et al.. (2021). Is Pain “All in your Mind”? Examining the General Public’s Views of Pain. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 13(3). 683–698. 5 indexed citations
6.
Borg, Emma, et al.. (2019). Is the folk concept of pain polyeidic?. Mind & Language. 35(1). 29–47. 22 indexed citations
7.
Borg, Emma. (2018). On Deflationary Accounts of Human Action Understanding. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 9(3). 503–522. 7 indexed citations
8.
Borg, Emma. (2017). Mirroring, mindreading and smart behaviour-reading. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 24. 1 indexed citations
9.
Borg, Emma & Brad Hooker. (2017). Epistemic Virtues Versus Ethical Values in the Financial Services Sector. Journal of Business Ethics. 155(1). 17–27. 11 indexed citations
10.
Borg, Emma. (2017). Explanatory Roles for Minimal Content. Noûs. 53(3). 513–539. 28 indexed citations
11.
Borg, Emma. (2016). Exploding Explicatures. Mind & Language. 31(3). 335–355. 16 indexed citations
13.
Borg, Emma. (2012). More questions for mirror neurons. Consciousness and Cognition. 22(3). 1122–1131. 5 indexed citations
14.
Borg, Emma. (2012). Pursuing Meaning. Oxford University Press eBooks. 64 indexed citations
15.
Borg, Emma. (2009). The Place of Referential Intentions in Linguistic Content. Manuscrito. 32(1). 85–122.
16.
Borg, Emma. (2007). If mirror neurons are the answer, what was the question?. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 14(8). 36 indexed citations
17.
Borg, Emma. (2004). Formal semantics and intentional states. Analysis. 64(283). 215–223. 3 indexed citations
18.
Borg, Emma. (2002). Meaning and representation. 4 indexed citations
19.
Borg, Emma & Paul Horwich. (2001). Meaning. The Philosophical Review. 110(1). 101–101. 3 indexed citations
20.
Borg, Emma. (2000). Complex Demonstratives. Philosophical Studies. 97(2). 229–249. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026