Emma Angell

520 total citations
19 papers, 353 citations indexed

About

Emma Angell is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Angell has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 353 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in General Health Professions, 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 5 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Emma Angell's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (11 papers), Ethics in medical practice (11 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (3 papers). Emma Angell is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (11 papers), Ethics in medical practice (11 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (3 papers). Emma Angell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Belarus. Emma Angell's co-authors include Mary Dixon‐Woods, Alan Bryman, Richard Ashcroft, Kate Windridge, Alex J. Sutton, Michelle O’Reilly, Carolyn Tarrant, Monica Lakhanpaul, Noelle Robertson and David H. Evans and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Lancet Oncology and Social Science & Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Emma Angell

19 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emma Angell United Kingdom	11	226	216	96	43	33	19	353
Rosemary Field United States	10	242 1.1×	162 0.8×	19 0.2×	32 0.7×	47 1.4×	20	418
Joniqua N. Ceasar United States	12	114 0.5×	75 0.3×	43 0.4×	40 0.9×	13 0.4×	18	338
Daniel F Perez Canada	10	163 0.7×	66 0.3×	23 0.2×	44 1.0×	10 0.3×	12	411
Lazare Benaroyo Switzerland	10	178 0.8×	180 0.8×	23 0.2×	28 0.7×	69 2.1×	47	354
Işıl Ergin Türkiye	11	100 0.4×	80 0.4×	52 0.5×	25 0.6×	32 1.0×	39	351
Jessica Haughton United States	12	171 0.8×	90 0.4×	83 0.9×	26 0.6×	14 0.4×	36	330
Silvana Silveira Kempfer Brazil	10	127 0.6×	91 0.4×	54 0.6×	26 0.6×	12 0.4×	62	326
Lynette Reid Canada	8	111 0.5×	45 0.2×	21 0.2×	36 0.8×	15 0.5×	38	254
Maria de Lourdes da Silva Marques Ferreira Brazil	9	146 0.6×	169 0.8×	10 0.1×	45 1.0×	33 1.0×	46	339
Kay Weiler United States	9	59 0.3×	56 0.3×	96 1.0×	23 0.5×	36 1.1×	35	266

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Angell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Angell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Angell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Angell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Angell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Angell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Angell. The network helps show where Emma Angell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Angell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Angell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Angell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Angell. Emma Angell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

Stark, Kristabel, et al.. (2024). Documenting teachers’ motivation for professional learning: a systematic review. Professional Development in Education. 51(6). 1023–1045. 1 indexed citations

Tarrant, Carolyn, Elizabeth Sutton, Emma Angell, et al.. (2017). The ‘weekend effect’ in acute medicine: a protocol for a team-based ethnography of weekend care for medical patients in acute hospital settings. BMJ Open. 7(4). e016755–e016755. 7 indexed citations

Lakhanpaul, Monica, Lorraine Culley, Noelle Robertson, et al.. (2017). A qualitative study to identify parents’ perceptions of and barriers to asthma management in children from South Asian and White British families. BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 17(1). 126–126. 26 indexed citations

Hudson, Nicky, Lorraine Culley, Mark Johnson, et al.. (2016). Asthma management in British South Asian children: an application of the candidacy framework to a qualitative understanding of barriers to effective and accessible asthma care. BMC Public Health. 16(1). 510–510. 18 indexed citations

Tarrant, Carolyn, Emma Angell, Richard Baker, et al.. (2014). Developing and piloting the questionnaires (pilots 1 and 2). 1 indexed citations

Tarrant, Carolyn, Emma Angell, Richard Baker, et al.. (2014). Responsiveness of primary care services: development of a patient-report measure – qualitative study and initial quantitative pilot testing. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(46). 1–368. 8 indexed citations

Angell, Emma, et al.. (2010). What do research ethics committees say about applications to conduct research involving children?. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 95(11). 915–917. 16 indexed citations

Angell, Emma & Mary Dixon‐Woods. (2009). Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?. Journal of Medical Ethics. 35(2). 130–132. 28 indexed citations

Angell, Emma, Carolyn Tarrant, & Mary Dixon‐Woods. (2009). Research involving storage and use of human tissue: how did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by research ethics committees?. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 62(9). 825–829. 6 indexed citations

10.

Dixon‐Woods, Mary & Emma Angell. (2009). Research involving adults who lack capacity: how have research ethics committees interpreted the requirements?: Figure 1. Journal of Medical Ethics. 35(6). 377–381. 21 indexed citations

11.

O’Reilly, Michelle, Mary Dixon‐Woods, Emma Angell, Richard Ashcroft, & Alan Bryman. (2009). Doing accountability: a discourse analysis of research ethics committee letters. Sociology of Health & Illness. 31(2). 246–261. 33 indexed citations

12.

Angell, Emma, Alan Bryman, Richard Ashcroft, & Mary Dixon‐Woods. (2008). An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined. BMJ Quality & Safety. 17(2). 131–136. 50 indexed citations

13.

Dixon‐Woods, Mary, Emma Angell, Carolyn Tarrant, & Anne Thomas. (2008). What do research ethics committees say about applications to do cancer trials?. The Lancet Oncology. 9(8). 700–701. 12 indexed citations

14.

Angell, Emma & Mary Dixon‐Woods. (2008). Style Matters: An Analysis of 100 Research Ethics Committee Decision Letters. Research Ethics. 4(3). 101–105. 1 indexed citations

15.

Dixon‐Woods, Mary, Emma Angell, Richard Ashcroft, & Alan Bryman. (2007). Written work: The social functions of Research Ethics Committee letters. Social Science & Medicine. 65(4). 792–802. 47 indexed citations

16.

Angell, Emma, et al.. (2007). Is 'inconsistency' in research ethics committee decision-making really a problem? An empirical investigation and reflection. Clinical Ethics. 2(2). 92–99. 26 indexed citations

17.

Cosford, Paul, Mary O’Mahony, Emma Angell, et al.. (2006). Public health professionals' perceptions toward provision of health protection in England: a survey of expectations of Primary Care Trusts and Health Protection Units in the delivery of health protection. BMC Public Health. 6(1). 297–297. 5 indexed citations

18.

Angell, Emma, Alex J. Sutton, Kate Windridge, & Mary Dixon‐Woods. (2006). Consistency in decision making by research ethics committees: a controlled comparison: Table 1. Journal of Medical Ethics. 32(11). 662–664. 37 indexed citations

19.

Angell, Emma & David H. Evans. (2003). Limits of uncertainty in measured values of embolus-to-blood ratio due to Doppler sample volume shape and location. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 29(7). 1037–1044. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact