Kate Windridge

897 total citations
20 papers, 653 citations indexed

About

Kate Windridge is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Windridge has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 653 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 5 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Kate Windridge's work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (6 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers). Kate Windridge is often cited by papers focused on Primary Care and Health Outcomes (6 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers). Kate Windridge collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belarus and United States. Kate Windridge's co-authors include Julia C. Berryman, Mary Boulton, George Freeman, Carolyn Tarrant, Richard Baker, Mary Dixon‐Woods, Clare Jackson, Sara Kenyon, Emma Angell and Rebecca J. McLean and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Ophthalmology, BMJ Open and Family Practice.

In The Last Decade

Kate Windridge

20 papers receiving 615 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kate Windridge United Kingdom 14 330 263 167 103 82 20 653
Kristie Keeton United States 11 312 0.9× 324 1.2× 69 0.4× 242 2.3× 63 0.8× 18 861
Liv Grøtvedt Norway 12 245 0.7× 144 0.5× 43 0.3× 112 1.1× 56 0.7× 23 659
Joseph W. Stockbauer United States 15 144 0.4× 178 0.7× 34 0.2× 372 3.6× 110 1.3× 18 717
Maryam Vizheh Iran 9 304 0.9× 109 0.4× 82 0.5× 93 0.9× 16 0.2× 23 701
Meredith Matone United States 15 165 0.5× 133 0.5× 42 0.3× 172 1.7× 35 0.4× 47 713
Mary Sawtell United Kingdom 10 243 0.7× 198 0.8× 78 0.5× 41 0.4× 20 0.2× 28 413
Frances R. Nedjat‐Haiem United States 15 226 0.7× 377 1.4× 120 0.7× 153 1.5× 62 0.8× 34 711
D.R. Williams United Kingdom 8 236 0.7× 48 0.2× 29 0.2× 68 0.7× 42 0.5× 14 648
Patricia Dunphy Suplee United States 18 175 0.5× 221 0.8× 27 0.2× 205 2.0× 61 0.7× 47 677
Helen Bunn Canada 7 559 1.7× 279 1.1× 109 0.7× 73 0.7× 21 0.3× 9 766

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Windridge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Windridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Windridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Windridge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Windridge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Windridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Windridge. The network helps show where Kate Windridge may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Windridge

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Windridge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Windridge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Windridge. Kate Windridge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wilson, Andrew, Dawn Coleby, Emma Regen, et al.. (2016). Service factors causing delay in specialist assessment for TIA and minor stroke: a qualitative study of GP and patient perspectives. BMJ Open. 6(5). e011654–e011654. 13 indexed citations
2.
Tarrant, Carolyn, Kate Windridge, Richard Baker, George Freeman, & Mary Boulton. (2014). ‘Falling through gaps’: primary care patients’ accounts of breakdowns in experienced continuity of care. Family Practice. 32(1). 82–87. 48 indexed citations
3.
Faull, Christina, Kate Windridge, Elizabeth M. Ockleford, & Michael J. Hudson. (2012). Anticipatory prescribing in terminal care at home: what challenges do community health professionals encounter?. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 3(1). 91–97. 36 indexed citations
4.
McLean, Rebecca J., Kate Windridge, & Irène Gottlob. (2012). Living with nystagmus: a qualitative study. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 96(7). 981–986. 42 indexed citations
5.
Turner, David, Carolyn Tarrant, Kate Windridge, et al.. (2007). Do patients value continuity of care in general practice? An investigation using stated preference discrete choice experiments. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 12(3). 132–137. 98 indexed citations
6.
Angell, Emma, et al.. (2007). Is 'inconsistency' in research ethics committee decision-making really a problem? An empirical investigation and reflection. Clinical Ethics. 2(2). 92–99. 26 indexed citations
7.
Baker, Richard, Mary Boulton, Kate Windridge, et al.. (2007). Interpersonal continuity of care: a cross-sectional survey of primary care patients' preferences and their experiences.. PubMed. 57(537). 283–9. 46 indexed citations
8.
Dixon‐Woods, Mary, Clare Jackson, Kate Windridge, & Sara Kenyon. (2006). Receiving a summary of the results of a trial: qualitative study of participants' views. BMJ. 332(7535). 206–210. 85 indexed citations
9.
Angell, Emma, Alex J. Sutton, Kate Windridge, & Mary Dixon‐Woods. (2006). Consistency in decision making by research ethics committees: a controlled comparison: Table 1. Journal of Medical Ethics. 32(11). 662–664. 37 indexed citations
10.
Boulton, Mary, Carolyn Tarrant, Kate Windridge, Richard Baker, & George Freeman. (2006). How are different types of continuity achieved? A mixed methods longitudinal study.. PubMed. 56(531). 749–55. 34 indexed citations
11.
Windridge, Kate, et al.. (2004). Problems with a 'target' approach to access in primary care: a qualitative study.. PubMed. 54(502). 364–6. 19 indexed citations
12.
Windridge, Kate & Julia C. Berryman. (1999). Women's Experiences of Giving Birth After 35. Birth. 26(1). 16–23. 49 indexed citations
13.
Berryman, Julia C., Karen Thorpe, & Kate Windridge. (1999). Age and parenting. 3. 4 indexed citations
14.
Berryman, Julia C. & Kate Windridge. (1997). Maternal age and employment in pregnancy and after childbirth. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 15(3-4). 287–302. 7 indexed citations
15.
Berryman, Julia C. & Kate Windridge. (1996). Pregnancy after 35 and attachment to the fetus. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 14(2). 133–143. 42 indexed citations
16.
Windridge, Kate & Julia C. Berryman. (1996). Maternal adjustment and maternal attitudes during pregnancy and early motherhood in women of 35 and over. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 14(1). 45–55. 19 indexed citations
17.
Berryman, Julia C., Karen Thorpe, & Kate Windridge. (1995). Older Mothers: Conception, Pregnancy and Birth After 35. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 30 indexed citations
18.
Berryman, Julia C. & Kate Windridge. (1993). Pregnancy after 35: A preliminary report on maternal-fetal attachment. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 11(3). 169–173. 4 indexed citations
19.
Berryman, Julia C. & Kate Windridge. (1991). II. A preliminary investigation of women's experience of motherhood. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 9(1). 19–33. 5 indexed citations
20.
Berryman, Julia C. & Kate Windridge. (1991). I. A preliminary investigation of women's experience of pregnancy. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 9(1). 3–18. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026