Emily Whiting

1.7k citations
47 papers · 1.3k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Emily Whiting

44 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Make it stand 2013 · 234 citations
234201320262017202150100150200

Peers

Emily Whiting
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 352
  • Architecture 75
  • Geology 219
  • Human-Computer Interaction 191
  • Space and Planetary Science 35
Replace Nico Pietroni with:
Nico Pietroni Italy
Moritz Bächer Switzerland
Peng Song China
Jun Mitani Japan
Qingnan Zhou United States
Ryan Schmidt Canada
Haisen Zhao China
Manfred Lau United Kingdom
Julian Panetta United States
Ruizhen Hu China
Emily Whiting relative to Nico Pietroni Italy Nico Pietroni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nico Pietroni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Whiting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Whiting's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Whiting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Whiting more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Whiting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Whiting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Whiting. The network helps show where Emily Whiting may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Whiting, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Whiting Line = papers co-authored together Emily Whiting links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20252
3 202427
4 20241
5 20244
6 20246
7 20249
8 20231
9 202156
10 202125
11 20211
12 201919
13 20183
14 201712
15 201711
16 2015109
17 201256
18 200932
19 200747
20
A Hierarchical 3D Reconstruction Approach for Documenting Complex Heritage Sites
200517

About Emily Whiting

Emily Whiting is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Geology, Human-Computer Interaction, Automotive Engineering and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (13 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (12 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (10 papers), Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies (10 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (7 papers), Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials (6 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (6 papers) and Topology Optimization in Engineering (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (352 citations), Architecture (75 citations), Geology (219 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (191 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (35 citations). Emily Whiting has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Olga Sorkine‐Hornung, Frédo Durand, John Ochsendorf, Sylvain Lefèbvre, Charlie C. L. Wang, Bernd Bickel, Moritz Bächer, Xiaoting Zhang, Xinyi Le and Sabry F. El-Hakim. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Graphics, Computer Graphics Forum, iScience, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026