Nadya Peek

612 total citations
42 papers, 425 citations indexed

About

Nadya Peek is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Automotive Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Nadya Peek has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 425 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 15 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 11 papers in Automotive Engineering. Recurrent topics in Nadya Peek's work include Interactive and Immersive Displays (28 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (12 papers) and Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies (11 papers). Nadya Peek is often cited by papers focused on Interactive and Immersive Displays (28 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (12 papers) and Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies (11 papers). Nadya Peek collaborates with scholars based in United States, Norway and Belgium. Nadya Peek's co-authors include Rogardt Heldal, Neil Gershenfeld, Raf Ramakers, Jennifer Jacobs, Emily Whiting, Eunice Jun, Corie L. Cobb, Vincent C. Holmberg, Lilo D. Pozzo and Danli Luo and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction.

In The Last Decade

Nadya Peek

42 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers

Nadya Peek
Jennifer Jacobs United States
César Torres United States
Lea Albaugh United States
Clement Zheng Singapore
Greg Saul United Kingdom
Raf Ramakers Belgium
Roy Shilkrot United States
Christian Weichel United Kingdom
Valkyrie Savage Denmark
Jennifer Jacobs United States
Nadya Peek
Citations per year, relative to Nadya Peek Nadya Peek (= 1×) peers Jennifer Jacobs

Countries citing papers authored by Nadya Peek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadya Peek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadya Peek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadya Peek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadya Peek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadya Peek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadya Peek. The network helps show where Nadya Peek may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadya Peek

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadya Peek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadya Peek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadya Peek. Nadya Peek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Luo, Danli, et al.. (2025). 3D-Printed Mycelium Biocomposites: Method for 3D Printing and Growing Fungi-Based Composites. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing. 12(2). 98–111. 4 indexed citations
2.
3.
Whiting, Emily, et al.. (2024). What's in a cable? Abstracting Knitting Design Elements with Blended Raster/Vector Primitives. 1–20. 4 indexed citations
4.
Lange, Orlando de, et al.. (2024). The Duckbot: A system for automated imaging and manipulation of duckweed. PLoS ONE. 19(1). e0296717–e0296717. 3 indexed citations
5.
6.
Peek, Nadya, et al.. (2024). Technical Mentality: Principles for HCI Research and Practice. 1–14. 2 indexed citations
7.
Peek, Nadya, et al.. (2023). 3D Printers Don’t Fix Themselves: How Maintenance is Part of Digital Fabrication. 2050–2065. 15 indexed citations
8.
Luo, Danli, Daniela K. Rosner, & Nadya Peek. (2023). Doufu, Rice Wine, and面饼: Supporting the Connections between Precision and Cultural Knowledge in Cooking. 1–13. 4 indexed citations
9.
Peek, Nadya, et al.. (2023). Jubilee: A Case Study of Distributed Manufacturing in an Open Source Hardware Project. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(1). 3 indexed citations
10.
Peek, Nadya, et al.. (2023). Dynamic Toolchains: Software Infrastructure for Digital Fabrication Workflows. 1–20. 11 indexed citations
11.
Peek, Nadya, et al.. (2023). A high-throughput workflow for the synthesis of CdSe nanocrystals using a sonochemical materials acceleration platform. Digital Discovery. 2(4). 1042–1057. 24 indexed citations
12.
Peek, Nadya, et al.. (2023). MAXL: Distributed Trajectories for Modular Motion. 1–11. 3 indexed citations
13.
Jacobs, Jennifer, et al.. (2023). Nothing Like Compilation: How Professional Digital Fabrication Workflows Go Beyond Extruding, Milling, and Machines. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 31(1). 1–45. 22 indexed citations
14.
Peek, Nadya, et al.. (2022). p5.fab: Direct Control of Digital Fabrication Machines from a Creative Coding Environment. Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1148–1161. 35 indexed citations
15.
Peek, Nadya, Jennifer Jacobs, Wendy Ju, Neil Gershenfeld, & Tom Igoe. (2021). Making at a Distance: Teaching Hands-on Courses During the Pandemic. 1–5. 6 indexed citations
16.
Peek, Nadya, et al.. (2020). Jubilee Demo: An Extensible Machine for Multi-Tool Fabrication. 1–4. 1 indexed citations
17.
Heldal, Rogardt, et al.. (2020). Fabricatable Machines. 411–422. 17 indexed citations
18.
Peek, Nadya, et al.. (2020). LamiFold. Lirias (KU Leuven). 304–316. 21 indexed citations
19.
Peek, Nadya, et al.. (2019). Machine-o-Matic. 134–136. 8 indexed citations
20.
Peek, Nadya, et al.. (2015). Design machines. 1–1. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer Jacobs Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by César Torres Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lea Albaugh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Clement Zheng Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Greg Saul Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Raf Ramakers Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Roy Shilkrot Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christian Weichel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Valkyrie Savage
Rankless by CCL
2026