Emily S. Boja
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Spectroscopy top 1%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Henry M. FalesHenry RodriguezTanya HoodbhoyJurrien DeanRobert S. BalabanP Boon ChockGuanghui WangEphrem Tekle
- Topics
- Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (23 papers)Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (10 papers)Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (7 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryNature Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenAustralia
In The Last Decade
Emily S. Boja
48 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Molecular Biology 1.6k
- Spectroscopy 639
- Cell Biology 221
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 216
- Reproductive Medicine 214
Countries citing papers authored by Emily S. Boja
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily S. Boja's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily S. Boja with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily S. Boja more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily S. Boja
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily S. Boja. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily S. Boja. The network helps show where Emily S. Boja may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily S. Boja
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily S. Boja. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily S. Boja based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily S. Boja. Emily S. Boja is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 77 | |
| 5 | 34 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 94 | |
| 8 | 62 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 145 | |
| 11 | 80 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 53 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 35 | |
| 17 | 66 | |
| 18 | 66 | |
| 19 | 71 | |
| 20 | 278 |
About Emily S. Boja
Emily S. Boja is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Molecular Biology and Cancer Research, having authored 48 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (23 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (10 papers) and Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (639 citations), Reproductive Medicine (214 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.6k citations). Emily S. Boja has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Henry M. Fales, Henry Rodriguez, Tanya Hoodbhoy, Jurrien Dean, Robert S. Balaban, P Boon Chock, Guanghui Wang, Ephrem Tekle, Jun Wang and Susan English. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Nature Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.