Daniel G. Saunders
- Health top 0.05%
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Gender Studies top 0.2%
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Co-authors
- Deborah K. AndersonRichard M. TolmanArlene N. WeiszMichelle CallahanDaniel LinzMarcia H. GraysonBeverly M. BlackKathleen C. Faller
- Topics
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence (49 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (24 papers)Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaTanzania
In The Last Decade
Daniel G. Saunders
63 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Health 3.3k
- Sociology and Political Science 2.0k
- Clinical Psychology 1.7k
- Gender Studies 1.2k
- General Health Professions 906
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel G. Saunders
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel G. Saunders's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel G. Saunders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel G. Saunders more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel G. Saunders
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel G. Saunders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel G. Saunders. The network helps show where Daniel G. Saunders may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel G. Saunders
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel G. Saunders. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel G. Saunders based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel G. Saunders. Daniel G. Saunders is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 26 | |
| 3 | 29 | |
| 4 | 99 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 75 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | Violence Against Women: Synthesis of Research on Offender Interventions | 26 |
| 10 | 344 | |
| 11 | 266 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 234 | |
| 15 | Wife abuse, husband abuse, or mutual combat?: A feminist perspective on the empirical findings. | 92 |
| 16 | The inventory of beliefs about wife-beating: The construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes. | 0 |
| 17 | 180 | |
| 18 | When battered women use violence: Husband abuse or self-defense? | 1 |
| 19 | 52 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Daniel G. Saunders
Daniel G. Saunders is a scholar working on Health, Gender Studies and Clinical Psychology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (49 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (24 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (3.3k citations), Gender Studies (1.2k citations) and Clinical Psychology (1.7k citations). Daniel G. Saunders has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Tanzania. Frequent co-authors include Deborah K. Anderson, Richard M. Tolman, Arlene N. Weisz, Michelle Callahan, Daniel Linz, Marcia H. Grayson, Beverly M. Black, Kathleen C. Faller, Kathleen Coulborn Faller and Karen Oehme. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Journal of Adolescence and Journal of Family Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.