Emily Leslie

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 489 citations indexed

About

Emily Leslie is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Leslie has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 489 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Emily Leslie's work include Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (2 papers) and Legal and Constitutional Studies (2 papers). Emily Leslie is often cited by papers focused on Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (2 papers) and Legal and Constitutional Studies (2 papers). Emily Leslie collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Emily Leslie's co-authors include Riley Wilson, Nolan Pope, Brigham Frandsen, Lars Lefgren, Jesse Jenkins, Neha Patankar, Greg Schivley, Joseph Price, David Frisvold and Vince D. Calhoun and has published in prestigious journals such as American Economic Review, The Review of Economics and Statistics and Journal of Economic Literature.

In The Last Decade

Emily Leslie

8 papers receiving 466 citations

Hit Papers

Sheltering in place and domestic violence: Evidence from ... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily Leslie United States 6 229 165 120 101 94 10 489
Riley Wilson United States 10 226 1.0× 172 1.0× 122 1.0× 129 1.3× 80 0.9× 23 571
Lauren Hoehn‐Velasco United States 12 228 1.0× 112 0.7× 125 1.0× 105 1.0× 61 0.6× 53 503
José Roberto Balmori de la Miyar Mexico 10 198 0.9× 110 0.7× 98 0.8× 75 0.7× 64 0.7× 39 391
Adan Silverio‐Murillo Mexico 9 192 0.8× 102 0.6× 95 0.8× 80 0.8× 60 0.6× 37 382
Jason Payne Australia 16 485 2.1× 143 0.9× 42 0.3× 149 1.5× 205 2.2× 75 713
Daniel Sledge United States 7 245 1.1× 102 0.6× 55 0.5× 67 0.7× 72 0.8× 19 417
Dan Anderberg United Kingdom 13 161 0.7× 185 1.1× 258 2.1× 105 1.0× 31 0.3× 51 600
Amiya Bhatia United Kingdom 15 136 0.6× 128 0.8× 46 0.4× 181 1.8× 153 1.6× 51 556
Austin L. Wright United States 11 319 1.4× 69 0.4× 204 1.7× 58 0.6× 93 1.0× 40 625
Maggie R. Jones United States 6 328 1.4× 67 0.4× 138 1.1× 124 1.2× 28 0.3× 15 564

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Leslie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Leslie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Leslie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Leslie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Leslie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Leslie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Leslie. The network helps show where Emily Leslie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Leslie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Leslie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Leslie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Leslie. Emily Leslie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Chyn, Eric, Brigham Frandsen, & Emily Leslie. (2025). Examiner and Judge Designs in Economics: A Practitioner’s Guide. Journal of Economic Literature. 63(2). 401–439.
2.
Frandsen, Brigham, Emily Leslie, & Stephen McIntyre. (2025). Cluster Jackknife Instrumental Variables Estimation. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1–19. 1 indexed citations
3.
Chyn, Eric, Brigham Frandsen, & Emily Leslie. (2024). Examiner and Judge Designs in Economics: A Practitioner's Guide. SSRN Electronic Journal.
4.
Patankar, Neha, et al.. (2023). Land use trade-offs in decarbonization of electricity generation in the American West. 4. 100107–100107. 17 indexed citations
5.
Frandsen, Brigham, Lars Lefgren, & Emily Leslie. (2022). Judging Judge Fixed Effects. American Economic Review. 113(1). 253–277. 42 indexed citations
6.
Wu, Grace C., Ryan Jones, Emily Leslie, et al.. (2022). Minimizing Conservation Impacts of Net Zero Energy Systems in the Western United States. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
7.
Leslie, Emily & Riley Wilson. (2020). Sheltering in place and domestic violence: Evidence from calls for service during COVID-19. Journal of Public Economics. 189. 104241–104241. 327 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Frisvold, David, Emily Leslie, & Joseph Price. (2019). DO TARGETED VOUCHERS INSTILL HABITS? EVIDENCE FROM WOMEN, INFANTS, AND CHILDREN. Contemporary Economic Policy. 38(1). 67–80. 6 indexed citations
9.
Bridwell, David A., et al.. (2017). Cortical Sensitivity to Guitar Note Patterns: EEG Entrainment to Repetition and Key. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 11. 90–90. 6 indexed citations
10.
Leslie, Emily & Nolan Pope. (2017). The Unintended Impact of Pretrial Detention on Case Outcomes: Evidence from New York City Arraignments. The Journal of Law and Economics. 60(3). 529–557. 89 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026