Emily K. Chen
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Clinical Psychology
- Demography top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Karl PillemerM. Carrington ReidSamantha ParkerCatherine RiffinRonald D. AdelmanMark S. LachsJeanne A. TeresiSonal Mehta
- Topics
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers)Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers)Diabetes Management and Education (4 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineAmerican Journal of Public HealthJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Emily K. Chen
26 papers receiving 386 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- General Health Professions 212
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 136
- Clinical Psychology 78
- Demography 57
- Psychiatry and Mental health 53
Countries citing papers authored by Emily K. Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily K. Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily K. Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily K. Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily K. Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily K. Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily K. Chen. The network helps show where Emily K. Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily K. Chen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily K. Chen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily K. Chen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily K. Chen. Emily K. Chen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | Evaluation of CMS's Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) Advanced Primary Care Practice (APCP) Demonstration | 0 |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 56 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 91 | |
| 19 | 55 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Emily K. Chen
Emily K. Chen is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Geriatrics and Gerontology and General Health Professions, having authored 28 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers) and Diabetes Management and Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (212 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (7 citations) and Health (43 citations). Emily K. Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Karl Pillemer, M. Carrington Reid, Samantha Parker, Catherine Riffin, Ronald D. Adelman, Mark S. Lachs, Jeanne A. Teresi, Sonal Mehta, Mildred Ramírez and Sangeeta C. Ahluwalia. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, American Journal of Public Health and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.