Thomas W. Concannon

2.7k total citations · 2 hit papers
61 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Thomas W. Concannon is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas W. Concannon has authored 61 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in General Health Professions, 20 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Thomas W. Concannon's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (16 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (10 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (8 papers). Thomas W. Concannon is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (16 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (10 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (8 papers). Thomas W. Concannon collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Thomas W. Concannon's co-authors include Laurel K. Leslie, John B. Wong, Kamal Patel, Melissa Fuster, Joseph Lau, Tully Saunders, John L. Griffith, Paul Meißner, David M. Kent and Jeanne‐Marie Guise and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and The American Journal of Cardiology.

In The Last Decade

Thomas W. Concannon

53 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

2014 330 citations Thomas W. Concannon, Melissa Fuster et al. Journal of General Internal Medicine profile →
A New Taxonomy for Stakeholder Engagement in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

2012 311 citations Thomas W. Concannon, Paul Meißner et al. Journal of General Internal Medicine profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas W. Concannon United States	18	725	341	285	177	152	61	1.5k
Kris Aubrey‐Bassler Canada	17	503 0.7×	180 0.5×	254 0.9×	242 1.4×	79 0.5×	64	1.5k
David Mark United States	20	384 0.5×	301 0.9×	178 0.6×	149 0.8×	113 0.7×	46	1.3k
Johanna Anderson United States	22	581 0.8×	223 0.7×	403 1.4×	327 1.8×	64 0.4×	53	1.9k
Minna Johansson Sweden	12	382 0.5×	216 0.6×	196 0.7×	127 0.7×	95 0.6×	26	1.2k
Roee Gutman United States	21	319 0.4×	188 0.6×	197 0.7×	192 1.1×	69 0.5×	100	1.4k
Leonard MacWilliam Canada	21	539 0.7×	332 1.0×	173 0.6×	273 1.5×	95 0.6×	46	1.4k
Liana Woskie United States	11	532 0.7×	467 1.4×	174 0.6×	100 0.6×	80 0.5×	22	1.3k
Michael A. Hussey United States	12	327 0.5×	152 0.4×	200 0.7×	210 1.2×	234 1.5×	24	1.9k
Garth Graham United States	24	523 0.7×	202 0.6×	317 1.1×	181 1.0×	534 3.5×	64	1.8k
Renuka Tipirneni United States	20	665 0.9×	540 1.6×	216 0.8×	173 1.0×	32 0.2×	82	1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas W. Concannon

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas W. Concannon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas W. Concannon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas W. Concannon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas W. Concannon

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas W. Concannon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas W. Concannon. The network helps show where Thomas W. Concannon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas W. Concannon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas W. Concannon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas W. Concannon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas W. Concannon. Thomas W. Concannon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Petkovic, Jennifer, Joanne Khabsa, Lyubov Lytvyn, et al.. (2025). Introducing a Series of Reviews Assessing Engagement in Evidence Syntheses. PubMed. 3(6). e70057–e70057.

Timbie, Justin W., et al.. (2024). Lessons on the use of real-world data in medical device research: findings from the National Evaluation System for Health Technology Test-Cases. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. 13(9). e240078–e240078. 2 indexed citations

Akl, Elie A., Joanne Khabsa, Jennifer Petkovic, et al.. (2024). “Interest‐holders”: A new term to replace “stakeholders” in the context of health research and policy. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(11). e70007–e70007. 20 indexed citations

Daudelin, Denise H., et al.. (2023). 120 Using Implementation Science to Develop a TL1 D&I Science Training Implementation Plan – ADDENDUM. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science. 7(1). e135–e135. 1 indexed citations

Akl, Elie A., Joanne Khabsa, Holger J. Schünemann, et al.. (2023). A new taxonomy is proposed for defining the interests of stakeholders’ representatives in health research: the case of guideline development. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 160. 147–150. 2 indexed citations

Magwood, Olivia, Alison Riddle, Jennifer Petkovic, et al.. (2022). PROTOCOL: Barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in health guideline development: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 18(2). e1237–e1237. 9 indexed citations

Concannon, Thomas W., et al.. (2021). Translational Impacts of World Trade Center Health Program Research: A Mixed Methods Study. RAND Corporation eBooks. 9(3). 8–8.

Wurcel, Alysse G., Jessica Wolpaw Reyes, Deirdre Burke, et al.. (2021). “I’m not gonna be able to do anything about it, then what’s the point?”: A broad group of stakeholders identify barriers and facilitators to HCV testing in a Massachusetts jail. PLoS ONE. 16(5). e0250901–e0250901. 11 indexed citations

Nowell, W. Benjamin, Shilpa Venkatachalam, Christine E. Stake, et al.. (2020). Identifying patient decisions and related information needs during decision making related to total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. 9(16). 1153–1166. 10 indexed citations

10.

Martin, Laurie T., et al.. (2018). Are Publicly Funded Health Databases Geographically Detailed and Timely Enough to Support Patient-Centered Outcomes Research?. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 34(3). 467–472. 3 indexed citations

11.

Concannon, Thomas W., Sean Grant, Vivian Welch, et al.. (2018). Practical Guidance for Involving Stakeholders in Health Research. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 34(3). 458–463. 109 indexed citations

12.

Nowell, W. Benjamin, et al.. (2017). THU0644 Patient decisions related to hip and knee arthroplasty and the factors influencing them. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 76. 449–449.

13.

Concannon, Thomas W., Melissa Fuster, Tully Saunders, et al.. (2014). A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 29(12). 1692–1701. 330 indexed citations breakdown →

14.

Concannon, Thomas W., Jason Nelson, David M. Kent, & John L. Griffith. (2013). Evidence of Systematic Duplication by New Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Programs. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 6(4). 400–408. 38 indexed citations

15.

Lin, Pei‐Jung, Thomas W. Concannon, Dan Greenberg, et al.. (2013). Does framing of cancer survival affect perceived value of care? A willingness-to-pay survey of US residents. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research. 13(4). 513–522. 14 indexed citations

16.

Concannon, Thomas W., Paul Meißner, Jo Anne Grunbaum, et al.. (2012). A New Taxonomy for Stakeholder Engagement in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 27(8). 985–991. 311 indexed citations breakdown →

17.

Selker, Harry P., Robin Ruthazer, Norma Terrin, et al.. (2011). Random Treatment Assignment Using Mathematical Equipoise for Comparative Effectiveness Trials. Clinical and Translational Science. 4(1). 10–16. 6 indexed citations

18.

Kent, David M., Robin Ruthazer, John L. Griffith, et al.. (2008). A Percutaneous Coronary Intervention–Thrombolytic Predictive Instrument to Assist Choosing Between Immediate Thrombolytic Therapy Versus Delayed Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction. The American Journal of Cardiology. 101(6). 790–795. 7 indexed citations

19.

Conrad, Lawrence I., et al.. (1980). The Cancer Data Management System Statistics Package. PubMed Central. 2. 1281–1285. 2 indexed citations

20.

Horwitz, Jill R., et al.. (1980). Computer-Assisted Patient Care Management in Medical Oncology.. PubMed Central. 2. 771–778. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact