Emily Hill

2.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
55 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Emily Hill is a scholar working on Information Systems, Software and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Hill has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Information Systems, 22 papers in Software and 15 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Emily Hill's work include Software Engineering Research (34 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (14 papers) and Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (13 papers). Emily Hill is often cited by papers focused on Software Engineering Research (34 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (14 papers) and Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (13 papers). Emily Hill collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Canada. Emily Hill's co-authors include Lori Pollock, K. Vijay‐Shanker, Giriprasad Sridhara, Zachary P. Fry, David Shepherd, Thomas Fritz, Gail C. Murphy, Jerry Alan Fails, James Clause and Dawn Lawrie and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering and Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology.

In The Last Decade

Emily Hill

54 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Towards automatically generating summary comments for Java methods

2010 359 citations Giriprasad Sridhara, Emily Hill et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emily Hill United States	19	1.5k	702	664	291	202	55	1.7k
Bogdan Dit United States	17	1.3k 0.8×	591 0.8×	416 0.6×	365 1.3×	122 0.6×	24	1.3k
Sonia Haiduc United States	17	1.1k 0.7×	466 0.7×	444 0.7×	257 0.9×	156 0.8×	29	1.1k
Adrian Kuhn Switzerland	13	927 0.6×	337 0.5×	415 0.6×	276 0.9×	95 0.5×	43	1.1k
Olga Baysal Canada	16	788 0.5×	280 0.4×	146 0.2×	188 0.6×	69 0.3×	38	938
Patanamon Thongtanunam Australia	16	935 0.6×	481 0.7×	142 0.2×	201 0.7×	86 0.4×	45	1.0k
Rabe Abdalkareem Canada	12	525 0.3×	192 0.3×	154 0.2×	173 0.6×	120 0.6×	31	655
William Hill Brown United States	5	543 0.4×	321 0.5×	257 0.4×	182 0.6×	65 0.3×	8	689
Daniel Shawcross Wilkerson United States	5	449 0.3×	181 0.3×	341 0.5×	159 0.5×	230 1.1×	7	831
David H. Hutchens United States	5	629 0.4×	342 0.5×	244 0.4×	142 0.5×	17 0.1×	7	733

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Hill

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Hill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Hill

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Hill. The network helps show where Emily Hill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Hill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Hill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Hill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Hill. Emily Hill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Anderson, Maggie, et al.. (2023). B.Y.O. Bees: Managing wild bee biodiversity in urban greenspaces. PLoS ONE. 18(4). e0281468–e0281468. 9 indexed citations

2.

Newman, Christian D., et al.. (2021). An Ensemble Approach for Annotating Source Code Identifiers With Part-of-Speech Tags. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 48(9). 3506–3522. 10 indexed citations

3.

Newman, Christian D., et al.. (2020). On the Generation, Structure, and Semantics of Grammar Patterns in Source Code Identifiers. RIT Scholar Works (Rochester Institute of Technology). 17 indexed citations

4.

Newman, Christian D., et al.. (2019). An Empirical Study of Abbreviations and Expansions in Software Artifacts. 269–279. 14 indexed citations

5.

Marlowe, Thomas J., et al.. (2017). The NECST Program-Networking and Engaging in Computer Science and Information Technology Program.

6.

Johnson, Philip M., Dan Port, & Emily Hill. (2016). An Athletic Approach to Software Engineering Education. 8–17. 5 indexed citations

7.

Hill, Emily, David Shepherd, & Lori Pollock. (2015). Exploring the use of concern element role information in feature location evaluation. 140–150. 4 indexed citations

8.

Hill, Emily, Philip M. Johnson, & Daniel Port. (2015). Is an Athletic Approach the Future of Software Engineering Education?. IEEE Software. 33(1). 97–100. 7 indexed citations

9.

Hill, Emily, David Shepherd, & Lori Pollock. (2015). Exploring the Use of Concern Element Role Information in Feature Location Evaluation. 55. 140–150. 4 indexed citations

10.

Hill, Emily, David Binkley, Dawn Lawrie, Lori Pollock, & K. Vijay‐Shanker. (2013). An empirical study of identifier splitting techniques. Empirical Software Engineering. 19(6). 1754–1780. 34 indexed citations

11.

Hill, Emily, Lori Pollock, & K. Vijay‐Shanker. (2011). Improving source code search with natural language phrasal representations of method signatures. 524–527. 59 indexed citations

12.

Hill, Emily, Lori Pollock, & K. Vijay‐Shanker. (2009). Automatically capturing source code context of NL-queries for software maintenance and reuse. 232–242. 157 indexed citations

13.

Hill, Emily, et al.. (2009). Mining source code to automatically split identifiers for software analysis. 71–80. 135 indexed citations

14.

Hill, Emily. (2008). Developing natural language-based program analyses and tools to expedite software maintenance. 1015–1018. 2 indexed citations

15.

Hill, Emily, et al.. (2008). AMAP. 79–88. 76 indexed citations

16.

Sridhara, Giriprasad, Emily Hill, Lori Pollock, & K. Vijay‐Shanker. (2008). Identifying Word Relations in Software: A Comparative Study of Semantic Similarity Tools. 123–132. 68 indexed citations

17.

Hill, Emily, Lori Pollock, & K. Vijay‐Shanker. (2007). Exploring the neighborhood with dora to expedite software maintenance. 14–23. 99 indexed citations

18.

Pollock, Lori, et al.. (2007). Introducing natural language program analysis. 15–16. 9 indexed citations

19.

Hill, Emily. (2003). Understanding when to use the new patient E/M codes.. PubMed. 10(8). 33–6. 5 indexed citations

20.

Hill, Emily. (2001). How to Get All the 99214s You Deserve [2001]. 8(9). 43. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact