Countries where authors publish in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
This network shows the impact of papers published in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology.
About ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
The 1.3k papers published in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology in the last decades have received a total of 37.1k indexed citations . Papers published in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology usually cover Software (645 papers), Information Systems (827 papers) and Signal Processing (201 papers) specifically the topics of Software Engineering Research (659 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (469 papers) and Software Reliability and Analysis Research (311 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology are Daniel Jackson, Gregg Rothermel, Mary Jean Harrold, Robert J. Allen, David Garlan, Audris Mockus, A. Jefferson Offutt, James D. Herbsleb, Roy T. Fielding and Alexander L. Wolf.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.