Emily Field
Impact in
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Tree-ring climate responses
- Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Geology and Paleoclimatology Research 5
- Ecology 3
- Isotope Analysis in Ecology 1
- Co-authors
- V. R. Switsur (3 shared papers)J. Waterhouse (2 shared papers)Steven A. Hill (1 shared paper)Tom ap Rees (1 shared paper)Neil J. Loader (1 shared paper)Mark S. Schreiner (1 shared paper)Lorelei Lingard (3 shared papers)Richard M. Ruddy (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Medical Education (7 papers)Perspectives on Medical Education (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)The Clinical Teacher (1 paper)The Holocene (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emily Field
22 papers receiving 513 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Atmospheric Science 259
- Global and Planetary Change 210
- Archeology 5
- Paleontology 29
- Neurology 53
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Field
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Field more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Field
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Field. The network helps show where Emily Field may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 177 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 64 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 2 |
About Emily Field
Emily Field is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Earth-Surface Processes, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (5 papers), Geological formations and processes (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (1 paper), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (1 paper), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (1 paper), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (1 paper) and Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (259 citations), Global and Planetary Change (210 citations), Archeology (5 citations), Paleontology (29 citations) and Neurology (53 citations). Emily Field has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include V. R. Switsur, J. Waterhouse, Steven A. Hill, Tom ap Rees, Neil J. Loader, Mark S. Schreiner, Lorelei Lingard, Richard M. Ruddy, Sayra Cristancho and Samuel K. Marx. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Education, Perspectives on Medical Education, BMJ Open, The Clinical Teacher and The Holocene.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.