Emily Field

749 total citations
25 papers, 507 citations indexed

About

Emily Field is a scholar working on Family Practice, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Atmospheric Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Field has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 507 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Family Practice, 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 5 papers in Atmospheric Science. Recurrent topics in Emily Field's work include Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (5 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (5 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers). Emily Field is often cited by papers focused on Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (5 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (5 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers). Emily Field collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Emily Field's co-authors include V. R. Switsur, J. Waterhouse, Tom ap Rees, Steven A. Hill, Neil J. Loader, Richard M. Ruddy, Mark S. Schreiner, Lorelei Lingard, Patrick Moss and Samuel K. Marx and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PEDIATRICS and Plant Cell & Environment.

In The Last Decade

Emily Field

22 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily Field Canada 10 256 212 74 67 65 25 507
Mònica Aguilera Spain 15 328 1.3× 254 1.2× 158 2.1× 94 1.4× 183 2.8× 29 855
K. G. McKenzie Australia 19 201 0.8× 22 0.1× 35 0.5× 16 0.2× 170 2.6× 61 884
Werner Müller Switzerland 13 37 0.1× 65 0.3× 64 0.9× 10 0.1× 36 0.6× 69 577
Jana Zech Germany 15 238 0.9× 37 0.2× 9 0.1× 11 0.2× 170 2.6× 30 778
Sissel Schroeder United States 12 126 0.5× 69 0.3× 32 0.4× 14 0.2× 77 1.2× 19 560
Lucas Stephens United States 3 75 0.3× 209 1.0× 14 0.2× 18 0.3× 159 2.4× 5 483
Edson Silva Brazil 14 56 0.2× 111 0.5× 7 0.1× 35 0.5× 208 3.2× 98 620
Zhang Hai China 13 52 0.2× 45 0.2× 9 0.1× 234 3.5× 15 0.2× 47 785
Jennifer Moody United States 11 55 0.2× 41 0.2× 25 0.3× 44 0.7× 50 0.8× 20 439
Bernard Lambert Canada 13 56 0.2× 126 0.6× 87 1.2× 18 0.3× 106 1.6× 46 801

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Field. The network helps show where Emily Field may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Field

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Field. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Field based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Field. Emily Field is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Field, Emily, et al.. (2025). Returning to Surgical Residency After Maternity Leave: Exploring Challenges and Shining a Light on the Motherhood Advantage. Journal of surgical education. 82(9). 103621–103621.
2.
Field, Emily, et al.. (2024). How to locate yourself (and others!) in the research process: The role of positionality. The Clinical Teacher. 21(6). e13819–e13819. 2 indexed citations
3.
5.
Field, Emily, et al.. (2023). Assessment of glucocorticoids, sex steroids, and innate immunity in wild red-eared slider turtles (Trachemys scripta elegans). General and Comparative Endocrinology. 339. 114288–114288. 8 indexed citations
6.
Watling, Christopher, et al.. (2022). ‘For the most part it works’: Exploring how authors navigate peer review feedback. Medical Education. 57(2). 151–160. 1 indexed citations
7.
Cristancho, Sayra, Emily Field, Lorelei Lingard, et al.. (2022). Ecological interchangeability: supporting team adaptive expertise in moments of disruption. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 27(5). 1361–1382. 5 indexed citations
8.
Cristancho, Sayra, Emily Field, & Taryn Taylor. (2022). Adapting despite <em>“walls coming down”</em>: Healthcare providers’ experiences of COVID-19 as an implosive adaptation. Perspectives on Medical Education. 11(4). 213–219. 5 indexed citations
9.
Watling, Christopher, Shiphra Ginsburg, Kori A. LaDonna, Lorelei Lingard, & Emily Field. (2021). Going against the grain: An exploration of agency in medical learning. Medical Education. 55(8). 942–950. 34 indexed citations
10.
Pack, Rachael, et al.. (2021). Not wanted on the voyage: highlighting intrinsic CanMEDS gaps in Competence by Design curricula. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12(4). 39–47. 9 indexed citations
11.
Cristancho, Sayra, et al.. (2021). Interchangeability in Military Interprofessional Health Care Teams: Lessons Into Collective Self-healing and the Benefits Thereof. Military Medicine. 186(Supplement_3). 16–22. 5 indexed citations
12.
LaDonna, Kori A., Emily Field, Christopher Watling, et al.. (2018). Navigating complexity in team‐based clinical settings. Medical Education. 52(11). 1125–1137. 17 indexed citations
13.
Field, Emily, Jonathan Tyler, Patricia Gadd, et al.. (2018). Coherent patterns of environmental change at multiple organic spring sites in northwest Australia: Evidence of Indonesian-Australian summer monsoon variability over the last 14,500 years. Quaternary Science Reviews. 196. 193–216. 16 indexed citations
14.
Cristancho, Sayra, Emily Field, & Lorelei Lingard. (2018). What is the state of complexity science in medical education research?. Medical Education. 53(1). 95–104. 22 indexed citations
15.
Field, Emily, Samuel K. Marx, Jordahna Haig, et al.. (2017). Untangling geochronological complexity in organic spring deposits using multiple dating methods. Quaternary Geochronology. 43. 50–71. 14 indexed citations
16.
Field, Emily, Hamish A. McGowan, Patrick Moss, & Samuel K. Marx. (2017). A late Quaternary record of monsoon variability in the northwest Kimberley, Australia. Quaternary International. 449. 119–135. 47 indexed citations
17.
Field, Emily, et al.. (1995). Only the Law Would Rule Between Us: Antimiscegenation, The Moral Economy of Dependency, and the Debate over Rights after the Civil War - Freedom: Personal Liberty and Private Law. Chicago-Kent law review. 70(3). 873.
18.
Hill, Steven A., J. Waterhouse, Emily Field, V. R. Switsur, & Tom ap Rees. (1995). Rapid recycling of triose phosphates in oak stem tissue. Plant Cell & Environment. 18(8). 931–936. 175 indexed citations
19.
Loader, Neil J., V. R. Switsur, & Emily Field. (1995). High-resolution stable isotope analysis of tree rings: implications of 'microdendroclimatology' for palaeoenvironmental research. The Holocene. 5(4). 457–460. 64 indexed citations
20.
Schreiner, Mark S., Emily Field, & Richard M. Ruddy. (1991). Infant Botulism: A Review of 12 Years' Experience at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. PEDIATRICS. 87(2). 159–165. 56 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026