Emily E. Witt
Impact in
-
- Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Innovations in Medical Education
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Papers in
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 2
- Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation 1
- Surgery 2
- Surgical Simulation and Training 2
- Co-authors
- Gezzer Ortega (8 shared papers)David W. Bates (4 shared papers)Numa P. Perez (5 shared papers)Lydia R. Maurer (4 shared papers)Jorge A. Rodriguez (1 shared paper)Amanda J. Reich (1 shared paper)Benjamin G. Allar (3 shared papers)Sarah R. Powell (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Annals of Surgery (2 papers)The American Journal of Surgery (2 papers)Nutrients (1 paper)Health Equity (1 paper)The Journal of Educational Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPortugalJapan
In The Last Decade
Emily E. Witt
14 papers receiving 275 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 101
- General Health Professions 64
- Oncology 43
- Library and Information Sciences 2
- Family Practice 2
Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Witt
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Witt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Witt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Witt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Witt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Witt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Witt. The network helps show where Emily E. Witt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily E. Witt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 178 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 0 |
About Emily E. Witt
Emily E. Witt is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, General Health Professions, Emergency Medicine and Education, having authored 15 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (1 paper), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper), Reading and Literacy Development (1 paper) and Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (101 citations), General Health Professions (64 citations), Oncology (43 citations), Library and Information Sciences (2 citations) and Family Practice (2 citations). Emily E. Witt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Portugal and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Gezzer Ortega, David W. Bates, Numa P. Perez, Lydia R. Maurer, Jorge A. Rodriguez, Amanda J. Reich, Benjamin G. Allar, Sarah R. Powell, Tanujit Dey and Gregory Peck. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgery, The American Journal of Surgery, Nutrients, Health Equity and The Journal of Educational Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.