Emily Deomano

422 citations
16 papers · 282 indexed · h-index 8
Topics
Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing (16 papers)Genetics and Plant Breeding (13 papers)Natural Products and Biological Research (7 papers)
Partner nations
AustraliaGermanyIndia

In The Last Decade

Emily Deomano

16 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers

Emily Deomano
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Plant Science 266
  • Surgery 114
  • Biomedical Engineering 91
  • Genetics 58
  • Molecular Biology 16
Replace Melina Cristina Mancini with:
Melina Cristina Mancini Brazil
Thiago Willian Almeida Balsalobre Brazil
M. C. Cox Australia
R. K. Singh India
Hugues Telismart France
Meredith McNeil Australia
Zhoutao Wang China
M. J. Pontif United States
Mintu Ram Meena India
Nazeema Jannoo France
Emily Deomano relative to Melina Cristina Mancini Brazil Melina Cristina Mancini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Melina Cristina Mancini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Deomano

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Deomano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Deomano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Deomano more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Deomano

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Deomano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Deomano. The network helps show where Emily Deomano may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Deomano

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Deomano. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Deomano based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Deomano. Emily Deomano is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 5
2 6
3 5
4 5
5 11
6 34
7 38
8 2
9 68
10 40
11
Development of a new variety-rating system for sugarcane smut using improved statistical methods
1
12 9
13
Analysis of sugarcane disease screening trials over years with a mixed model to improve ratings of varieties
2
14 15
15
A NEW METHOD OF STATISTICAL ANALYSIS FOR SUGARCANE DISEASE SCREENING TRIALS
3
16 38

About Emily Deomano

Emily Deomano is a scholar working on Horticulture, Plant Science and Surgery, having authored 16 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing (16 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (13 papers) and Natural Products and Biological Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (8 citations), Plant Science (266 citations) and Surgery (114 citations). Emily Deomano has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and India. Frequent co-authors include Xianming Wei, Karen S. Aitken, Phillip Jackson, Ben J. Hayes, Elizabeth M. Ross, Kai P. Voss‐Fels, Loan Nguyen, Paulino Pérez‐Rodríguez, Shamsul A. Bhuiyan and Raja Kota. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Plant Science, Theoretical and Applied Genetics and Plant Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026