Phillip Jackson
- Plant Science top 5%
- Surgery
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Martin RavallionT. A. McRaeM. J. RobertsonMark CooperGraeme HammerKaren S. AitkenDavid HealdCatherine Waddams Price
- Topics
- Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing (22 papers)Natural Products and Biological Research (15 papers)Genetics and Plant Breeding (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Phillip Jackson
43 papers receiving 846 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Plant Science 550
- Surgery 174
- Economics and Econometrics 129
- Political Science and International Relations 118
- Biomedical Engineering 92
Countries citing papers authored by Phillip Jackson
This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip Jackson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip Jackson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip Jackson. The network helps show where Phillip Jackson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phillip Jackson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phillip Jackson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phillip Jackson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phillip Jackson. Phillip Jackson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 68 | |
| 3 | Canopy temperature: a predictor of sugarcane yield for irrigated and rainfed conditions | 9 |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | Parental improvement in the SRA sugarcane breeding program | 3 |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 42 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | Managing Public Sector Networked Organizations | 1 |
| 10 | 58 | |
| 11 | 56 | |
| 12 | Privatisation and regulation : a review of the issues | 38 |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 119 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | Current issues in fiscal policy | 18 |
About Phillip Jackson
Phillip Jackson is a scholar working on Horticulture, Plant Science and Public Administration, having authored 43 papers that have together received 964 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing (22 papers), Natural Products and Biological Research (15 papers) and Genetics and Plant Breeding (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (69 citations), Plant Science (550 citations) and Horticulture (14 citations). Phillip Jackson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Martin Ravallion, T. A. McRae, M. J. Robertson, Mark Cooper, Graeme Hammer, Karen S. Aitken, David Heald, Catherine Waddams Price, Xianming Wei and Emily Deomano. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Experimental Botany and The Economic Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.