Emily Coleman

411 total citations
11 papers, 254 citations indexed

About

Emily Coleman is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Coleman has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 254 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Clinical Psychology, 5 papers in Gender Studies and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Emily Coleman's work include Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers). Emily Coleman is often cited by papers focused on Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers). Emily Coleman collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Emily Coleman's co-authors include William D. Murphy, Mary R. Haynes, Emily Franck Hoon, Peter W. Hoon, Dan Cass, Navindra Persaud, Barry Flanagan, Judith Becker, Gene G. Abel and Edward B. Blanchard and has published in prestigious journals such as Canadian Medical Association Journal, The Journal of Sex Research and Violence and Victims.

In The Last Decade

Emily Coleman

10 papers receiving 224 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emily Coleman United States	8	118	83	71	53	46	11	254
Mia Cathrine Myhre Norway	10	201 1.7×	15 0.2×	39 0.5×	45 0.8×	7 0.2×	18	282
Esteban Puente-López Spain	10	76 0.6×	11 0.1×	91 1.3×	12 0.2×	6 0.1×	41	265
Christine Smith Australia	4	189 1.6×	21 0.3×	50 0.7×	26 0.5×	3 0.1×	4	280
Thea Rau Germany	8	124 1.1×	93 1.1×	97 1.4×	24 0.5×		39	313
John Q. La Fond United States	9	333 2.8×	24 0.3×	157 2.2×	49 0.9×		16	371
Filipa Alves-Costa United Kingdom	6	229 1.9×	54 0.7×	98 1.4×	31 0.6×		19	300
Rebekah Doley Australia	9	204 1.7×	8 0.1×	167 2.4×	23 0.4×	8 0.2×	29	324
Tammi Walker United Kingdom	12	172 1.5×	29 0.3×	116 1.6×	39 0.7×		40	286
Mark Cameron United States	8	189 1.6×	7 0.1×	49 0.7×	23 0.4×	8 0.2×	15	290
Emma C. Lathan United States	11	181 1.5×	59 0.7×	79 1.1×	12 0.2×		44	283

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Coleman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Coleman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Coleman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Coleman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Coleman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Coleman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Coleman. The network helps show where Emily Coleman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Coleman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Coleman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Coleman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Coleman. Emily Coleman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Coleman, Emily, et al.. (2021). Cervical Neuroforaminal Stenosis With Radiculopathy. 1(1). 34–35.

2.

Persaud, Navindra, et al.. (2012). Nonuse of bicycle helmets and risk of fatal head injury: a proportional mortality, case–control study. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 184(17). E921–E923. 56 indexed citations

3.

Murphy, William D., Emily Coleman, & Mary R. Haynes. (1986). Factors Related to Coercive Sexual Behavior in a Nonclinical Sample of Males. Violence and Victims. 1(4). 255–278. 57 indexed citations

4.

Murphy, William D., Mary R. Haynes, Emily Coleman, & Barry Flanagan. (1985). Sexual responding of ?nonrapists? to aggressive sexual themes: Normative data. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 7(1). 37–47. 24 indexed citations

5.

Travin, Sheldon, et al.. (1985). Pedophilia: An update on theory and practice. Psychiatric Quarterly. 57(2). 89–103. 14 indexed citations

6.

Coleman, Emily, Peter W. Hoon, & Emily Franck Hoon. (1983). Arousability and sexual satisfaction in lesbian and heterosexual women. The Journal of Sex Research. 19(1). 58–73. 36 indexed citations

7.

Hoon, Emily Franck, et al.. (1983). Low Female Sexual Arousal. Behavior Modification. 7(2). 197–210. 2 indexed citations

8.

Coleman, Emily & William D. Murphy. (1980). A survey of sexual attitudes and sex education programs among facilities for the mentally retarded. Applied Research in Mental Retardation. 1(3-4). 269–276. 21 indexed citations

9.

Murphy, William D., et al.. (1980). Sexual dysfunction and treatment in alcoholic women. Sexuality and Disability. 3(4). 240–255. 18 indexed citations

10.

Becker, Judith, Gene G. Abel, Edward B. Blanchard, William D. Murphy, & Emily Coleman. (1978). Evaluating Social Skills of Sexual Aggressives. 5(4). 357–368. 21 indexed citations

11.

Coleman, Emily, et al.. (1975). A Program of Sexual Assertiveness Training For Women. The Counseling Psychologist. 5(4). 74–78. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact