Kathryn Pyle Krages

8 papers receiving 351 citations

Peers

Kathryn Pyle Krages
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • General Health Professions 140
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 118
  • Emergency Medical Services 62
  • Epidemiology 54
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 52
Replace Rhonda Schoville with:
Rhonda Schoville United States
Rebecca Lake Australia
Deborah M. Nadzam United States
Karen Zander United States
Stephen Schenkel United States
Myoung Soo Kim South Korea
Cori Gibson United States
Michelle Mourad United States
T. Hooper Australia
Arianna Magon Italy
Kathryn Pyle Krages relative to Rhonda Schoville United States Rhonda Schoville's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Rhonda Schoville · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kathryn Pyle Krages

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn Pyle Krages's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn Pyle Krages with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn Pyle Krages more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathryn Pyle Krages

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn Pyle Krages. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn Pyle Krages. The network helps show where Kathryn Pyle Krages may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathryn Pyle Krages

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathryn Pyle Krages. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathryn Pyle Krages based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathryn Pyle Krages. Kathryn Pyle Krages is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 34
2 124
3
Telemedicine for the medicare population: update.
71
4
The effect of health care working conditions on patient safety.
100
5 25
6
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of echocardiography and carotid imaging in the management of stroke.
16
7
The Oregon IAIMS: then and now.
5
8 8

About Kathryn Pyle Krages

Kathryn Pyle Krages is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Medical Laboratory Technology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 8 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Systems and Technology (3 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (11 citations), Health Information Management (44 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (62 citations). Kathryn Pyle Krages has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include William Hersh, Mark Helfand, David H. Hickam, Adrianne C. Feldstein, Leslie Upledger Ray, Paul Gorman, Marian McDonagh, Mark Helfand, Joan S. Ash and Richard T. Meenan. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Medical Decision Making and Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026