Emily C. Stanyer

698 total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 359 citations indexed

About

Emily C. Stanyer is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily C. Stanyer has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 359 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 4 papers in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems. Recurrent topics in Emily C. Stanyer's work include Migraine and Headache Studies (5 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (3 papers) and Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers). Emily C. Stanyer is often cited by papers focused on Migraine and Headache Studies (5 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (3 papers) and Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers). Emily C. Stanyer collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Iran and Belgium. Emily C. Stanyer's co-authors include Ali Alazmani, Muhammad Awais, Raymond Holt, Andrew Jackson, Mark Mon‐Williams, Faisal Mushtaq, Jan Hoffmann, Philip R. Holland, Alexander Nesbitt and Linda Al‐Hassany and has published in prestigious journals such as Brain, Neurology and Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

Emily C. Stanyer

8 papers receiving 353 citations

Hit Papers

Primary headache epidemiology in children and adolescents... 2023 2026 2024 2025 2023 25 50 75

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily C. Stanyer United Kingdom 7 175 130 59 59 59 9 359
Li‐Ling Hope Pan Taiwan 12 166 0.9× 141 1.1× 54 0.9× 17 0.3× 45 0.8× 33 347
Bogdan Ignat Romania 9 46 0.3× 110 0.8× 58 1.0× 8 0.1× 14 0.2× 40 275
Nathan D. Neckel United States 11 158 0.9× 39 0.3× 28 0.5× 44 0.7× 15 0.3× 16 496
Francesca Caleri Austria 12 56 0.3× 187 1.4× 34 0.6× 21 0.4× 24 0.4× 17 415
Peter Höller Austria 13 143 0.8× 304 2.3× 140 2.4× 4 0.1× 29 0.5× 21 521
Luisa Roeder Australia 6 96 0.5× 94 0.7× 40 0.7× 42 0.7× 22 0.4× 12 303
Ran Shorer Israel 7 107 0.6× 146 1.1× 27 0.5× 27 0.5× 60 1.0× 11 395
Vrutangkumar V. Shah United States 13 224 1.3× 39 0.3× 76 1.3× 3 0.1× 30 0.5× 41 637
Valeria Agosti Italy 12 140 0.8× 88 0.7× 28 0.5× 3 0.1× 28 0.5× 24 430
C.G.S. Kramer Netherlands 11 37 0.2× 145 1.1× 68 1.2× 31 0.5× 38 0.6× 14 349

Countries citing papers authored by Emily C. Stanyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily C. Stanyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily C. Stanyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily C. Stanyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily C. Stanyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily C. Stanyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily C. Stanyer. The network helps show where Emily C. Stanyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily C. Stanyer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily C. Stanyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily C. Stanyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily C. Stanyer. Emily C. Stanyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Grech, Olivia, Eloísa Rubio‐Beltrán, Emily C. Stanyer, et al.. (2025). Raised intracranial pressure alters cortical vascular function and cephalic allodynia. Brain. 148(6). 2163–2177.
2.
Stanyer, Emily C., Jan Hoffmann, & Philip R. Holland. (2024). Orexins and primary headaches: an overview of the neurobiology and clinical impact. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 24(5). 487–496. 7 indexed citations
3.
Labastida‐Ramírez, Alejandro, Edoardo Caronna, Cédric Gollion, et al.. (2023). Mode and site of action of therapies targeting CGRP signaling. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 24(1). 125–125. 33 indexed citations
4.
Onofri, Agnese, Umberto Pensato, William Wells-Gatnik, et al.. (2023). Primary headache epidemiology in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 24(1). 8–8. 86 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Al‐Hassany, Linda, Deirdre M. Boucherie, Fatemeh Farham, et al.. (2023). Future targets for migraine treatment beyond CGRP. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 24(1). 76–76. 28 indexed citations
6.
Stanyer, Emily C., et al.. (2023). Investigating the relationship between sleep and migraine in a global sample: a Bayesian cross-sectional approach. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 24(1). 123–123. 4 indexed citations
7.
Stanyer, Emily C., et al.. (2021). Subjective Sleep Quality and Sleep Architecture in Patients With Migraine. Neurology. 97(16). e1620–e1631. 57 indexed citations
8.
Stanyer, Emily C., Muhammad Awais, Ali Alazmani, et al.. (2021). Brain–computer interface robotics for hand rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 18(1). 15–15. 138 indexed citations
9.
Stanyer, Emily C., Muhammad Awais, Ali Alazmani, et al.. (2019). Brain-Computer Interface Robotics for Hand Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Systematic Review. medRxiv. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026