Emily C. Melvin
- Pollution top 5%
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering top 5%
- Biomaterials
- Ecology
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 10%
- Co-authors
- John VirdinDaniel RittschofMeagan M. Dunphy‐DalyJason A. SomarelliZoie DianaCarter S. SmithRachel K. GittmanJulianna J. Renzi
- Topics
- Coastal and Marine Management (3 papers)International Maritime Law Issues (2 papers)Urinary Tract Infections Management (1 paper)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaEnvironment InternationalObstetrics and Gynecology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Emily C. Melvin
7 papers receiving 380 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Pollution 222
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 165
- Biomaterials 79
- Ecology 63
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 61
Countries citing papers authored by Emily C. Melvin
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily C. Melvin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily C. Melvin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily C. Melvin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily C. Melvin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily C. Melvin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily C. Melvin. The network helps show where Emily C. Melvin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily C. Melvin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily C. Melvin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily C. Melvin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily C. Melvin. Emily C. Melvin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 293 | |
| 5 | Tourism, Environmental Stewardship, and Community Engagement on Andros Island, Bahamas | 1 |
| 6 | 80 | |
| 7 | An Unacceptable Exception: The Ramifications of Physician Immunity from Medical Procedure Patent Infringement Liability | 1 |
About Emily C. Melvin
Emily C. Melvin is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Urology and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 7 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coastal and Marine Management (3 papers), International Maritime Law Issues (2 papers) and Urinary Tract Infections Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (165 citations), Pollution (222 citations) and Biomaterials (79 citations). Emily C. Melvin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include John Virdin, Daniel Rittschof, Meagan M. Dunphy‐Daly, Jason A. Somarelli, Zoie Diana, Carter S. Smith, Rachel K. Gittman, Julianna J. Renzi, Brian R. Silliman and Lisa M. Campbell. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Environment International and Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.