Emanuele Baldacci
Impact in
-
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
- Finance top 1%
- Global Financial Crisis and Policies
- Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
- Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
Papers in
- Finance 18
- Global Financial Crisis and Policies 17
-
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact 12
- Co-authors
- Sanjeev GuptaBenedict ClementsCarlos Mulas‐GranadosAmine MatiManmohan KumarLuiz De MelloIva PetrovaArye L. Hillman
- Journals
- Labour (2 papers)Review of Development Economics (2 papers)European Journal of Political Economy (1 paper)Occasional paper (1 paper)Empirical Economics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalySpain
In The Last Decade
Emanuele Baldacci
56 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 617
- Finance 661
- Economics and Econometrics 1.6k
- Development 107
- Accounting 155
Countries citing papers authored by Emanuele Baldacci
This map shows the geographic impact of Emanuele Baldacci's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emanuele Baldacci with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emanuele Baldacci more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emanuele Baldacci
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emanuele Baldacci. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emanuele Baldacci. The network helps show where Emanuele Baldacci may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emanuele Baldacci, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 74 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 142 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 29 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 44 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 42 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 11 | |
| 20 | Social expenditure and demographic evolution: a dynamic approach. | 1998 | 3 |
About Emanuele Baldacci
Emanuele Baldacci is a scholar working on Finance, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting and General Health Professions, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (32 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (31 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (17 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (12 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (9 papers), Global Health Care Issues (8 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (7 papers) and Local Government Finance and Decentralization (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (617 citations), Finance (661 citations), Economics and Econometrics (1.6k citations), Development (107 citations) and Accounting (155 citations). Emanuele Baldacci has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Sanjeev Gupta, Benedict Clements, Carlos Mulas‐Granados, Sanjeev Gupta, Amine Mati, Manmohan Kumar, Luiz De Mello, Iva Petrova, Arye L. Hillman and Gabriela Inchauste. Their work appears in journals such as Labour, Review of Development Economics, European Journal of Political Economy, Occasional paper and Empirical Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.