Emanuela Soleti
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Antonietta CurciTiziana LancianoBernard RiméAndrea BoscoGiulio E. LancioniVanda ZammunerIvan MangiulliPeter Salovey
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers)Memory Processes and Influences (3 papers)Emotional Intelligence and Performance (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEFrontiers in Psychology
- Partner nations
- ItalySwitzerlandAustria
In The Last Decade
Emanuela Soleti
14 papers receiving 271 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Social Psychology 109
- Clinical Psychology 102
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 98
- Cognitive Neuroscience 84
- General Health Professions 30
Countries citing papers authored by Emanuela Soleti
This map shows the geographic impact of Emanuela Soleti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emanuela Soleti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emanuela Soleti more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emanuela Soleti
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emanuela Soleti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emanuela Soleti. The network helps show where Emanuela Soleti may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emanuela Soleti
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emanuela Soleti. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emanuela Soleti based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emanuela Soleti. Emanuela Soleti is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | 107 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | A new methodology to assess individual differences in spatial memory: The computer generated version of the Reorientation Paradigm | 6 |
| 14 | 29 |
About Emanuela Soleti
Emanuela Soleti is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (3 papers) and Emotional Intelligence and Performance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (98 citations), Social Psychology (109 citations) and Clinical Psychology (102 citations). Emanuela Soleti has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Switzerland and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Antonietta Curci, Tiziana Lanciano, Bernard Rimé, Andrea Bosco, Giulio E. Lancioni, Vanda Zammuner, Ivan Mangiulli, Peter Salovey, Leonardo Fazio and Cristina Cabras. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.