Emanuela Cardia

1.4k citations
34 papers · 793 indexed · h-index 14

Emanuela Cardia

31 papers receiving 702 citations

Peers

Emanuela Cardia
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 571
  • Economics and Econometrics 579
  • Finance 201
  • Gender Studies 69
  • Accounting 77
Replace Jo Anna Gray with:
Jo Anna Gray United States
Evi Pappa Spain
R. Anton Braun United States
Patrick K. Asea United States
Luca Benati Germany
James Cloyne United Kingdom
Chong K. Yip Hong Kong
William T. Smith United States
Monika Merz Germany
Saeid Mahdavi United States
Emanuela Cardia relative to Jo Anna Gray United States Jo Anna Gray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Jo Anna Gray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emanuela Cardia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emanuela Cardia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emanuela Cardia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emanuela Cardia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emanuela Cardia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emanuela Cardia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emanuela Cardia. The network helps show where Emanuela Cardia may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Emanuela Cardia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emanuela Cardia Line = papers co-authored together Emanuela Cardia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20204
2 201710
3 20178
4 20168
5 20142
6
The Household Revolution: Childcare, Housework,and Female Labor Force Participation
20135
7 201344
8 20094
9 200990
10 20091
11 200913
12
THE EFFECT OF PUBLIC SPENDING ON CONSUMPTION : RECONCILING THEORY AND EVIDENCE
20082
13
The Transmission of Monetary Policy in a Multi-Sector Economy
200533
14 200312
15 19997
16 199817
17
How Important Are Intergenerational Transfers of Time? A Macroeconomic Analysis
19975
18
Replicating Ricardian Equivalence Tests with Simulated Series
199742
19 19928
20
International capital mobility and aggregate saving and investment
19871

About Emanuela Cardia

Emanuela Cardia is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Gender Studies, having authored 34 papers that have together received 793 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (20 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (11 papers), Economic theories and models (11 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (10 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (10 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (9 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (4 papers) and Market Dynamics and Volatility (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (571 citations), Economics and Econometrics (579 citations) and Finance (201 citations). Emanuela Cardia has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Francisco J. Ruge‐Murcia, Hafedh Bouakez, Steve Ambler, Christian Zimmermann, Serena Ng, Philippe Michel, Paul Gomme and Louis Phaneuf. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, Journal of Monetary Economics and Journal of Development Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026