Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence
2020339 citationsMarijn Janssen, Elsa Estévez et al.profile →
Lean government and platform-based governance—Doing more with less
This map shows the geographic impact of Elsa Estévez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elsa Estévez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elsa Estévez more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elsa Estévez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elsa Estévez. The network helps show where Elsa Estévez may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elsa Estévez
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elsa Estévez.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elsa Estévez based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Elsa Estévez. Elsa Estévez is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Estévez, Elsa, Tomasz Janowski, & Nuno Vasco Lopes. (2016). Policy Monitoring on Accessible Technology for Inclusive Education – Research Findings and Requirements for a Software Tool. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
5.
Pesado, Patricia Mabel, et al.. (2016). Aseguramiento de la calidad en productos, procesos de software y procesos de gestión para la mejora de las sociedades del conocimiento. CIC-Digital (Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires).1 indexed citations
6.
Estévez, Elsa & Tomasz Janowski. (2016). Gobierno digital, ciudadanos y ciudades inteligentes. Americanae (AECID Library).3 indexed citations
7.
Fillottrani, Pablo Rubén, et al.. (2012). Information sharing: benefits. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.7 indexed citations
8.
Grosse, Kathrin, Carlos Iván Chesñevar, Ana Gabriela Maguitman, & Elsa Estévez. (2012). Empowering an E-Government Platform Through Twitter-Based Arguments. Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México). 15(50). 46–56.5 indexed citations
9.
Estévez, Elsa, Luís Soares Barbosa, & Marijn Janssen. (2011). Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV2011). UNU Collections (United Nations University).9 indexed citations
Estévez, Elsa, Pablo Rubén Fillottrani, & Tomasz Janowski. (2010). Information sharing in government: conceptual model for policy formulation. UNU Collections (United Nations University).16 indexed citations
12.
Estévez, Elsa, et al.. (2009). Un framework para evaluación de metodologías ágiles.4 indexed citations
Estévez, Elsa, et al.. (2009). Assessing e-governance maturity through municipal websites – measurement framework and survey results. El Servicio de Difusión de la Creación Intelectual (National University of La Plata).4 indexed citations
15.
Ojo, Adegboyega, Tomasz Janowski, & Elsa Estévez. (2007). A Composite Domain Framework for Developing Electronic Public Services.. MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library (National University of Ireland, Maynooth). 234–241.4 indexed citations
16.
Ojo, Adegboyega, Tomasz Janowski, & Elsa Estévez. (2005). Determining progress towards e-government: what are the core indicators?. MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library (National University of Ireland, Maynooth). 312–322.24 indexed citations
17.
Estévez, Elsa, et al.. (2004). Evaluation of UML extensions for aspect oriented design. El Servicio de Difusión de la Creación Intelectual (National University of La Plata).1 indexed citations
18.
Castro, Silvia Mabel, et al.. (2003). Arquitectura de sistemas de visualización. El Servicio de Difusión de la Creación Intelectual (National University of La Plata).
19.
Castro, Silvia Mabel, et al.. (2003). Un modelo unificado de visualización. El Servicio de Difusión de la Creación Intelectual (National University of La Plata).7 indexed citations
20.
Fillottrani, Pablo Rubén, et al.. (2001). Applying Logic Programming Techniques to Object-Oriented Modeling in UML.. Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. 228–235.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.