Ellen De Roeck

4.4k total citations
16 papers, 467 citations indexed

About

Ellen De Roeck is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology and Geriatrics and Gerontology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ellen De Roeck has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 467 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 9 papers in Physiology and 7 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology. Recurrent topics in Ellen De Roeck's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (9 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (7 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (6 papers). Ellen De Roeck is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (9 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (7 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (6 papers). Ellen De Roeck collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Nepal. Ellen De Roeck's co-authors include Sebastiaan Engelborghs, Eva Dierckx, Peter Paul De Deyn, Ellis Niemantsverdriet, Hanne Struyfs, Christine Van Broeckhoven, Maria Bjerke, Sigrid Stroobants, Julie Ottoy and Steven Staelens and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

Ellen De Roeck

15 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ellen De Roeck Belgium	9	271	189	99	73	71	16	467
Laura Maggiore Italy	13	306 1.1×	203 1.1×	77 0.8×	51 0.7×	56 0.8×	20	543
Jane Lonie United Kingdom	11	350 1.3×	126 0.7×	202 2.0×	75 1.0×	60 0.8×	13	531
Linda M.P. Wesselman Netherlands	10	379 1.4×	233 1.2×	119 1.2×	35 0.5×	34 0.5×	14	520
Maitée Rosende‐Roca Spain	12	311 1.1×	132 0.7×	165 1.7×	41 0.6×	25 0.4×	27	487
Isabel Cruz Spain	15	238 0.9×	69 0.4×	96 1.0×	82 1.1×	53 0.7×	28	510
David Bergeron Canada	12	306 1.1×	187 1.0×	182 1.8×	57 0.8×	27 0.4×	40	596
Louis Verret Canada	11	253 0.9×	118 0.6×	161 1.6×	41 0.6×	26 0.4×	26	415
Hanna Wetterberg Sweden	14	183 0.7×	163 0.9×	46 0.5×	22 0.3×	44 0.6×	36	552
Inge Loy-English Canada	11	319 1.2×	171 0.9×	88 0.9×	35 0.5×	24 0.3×	11	530
Dana M. Swenson-Dravis United States	4	292 1.1×	153 0.8×	100 1.0×	24 0.3×	31 0.4×	8	382

Countries citing papers authored by Ellen De Roeck

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen De Roeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen De Roeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen De Roeck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen De Roeck

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen De Roeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen De Roeck. The network helps show where Ellen De Roeck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ellen De Roeck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ellen De Roeck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ellen De Roeck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ellen De Roeck. Ellen De Roeck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

Elst, Michaël Van der, Birgitte Schoenmakers, Eva Dierckx, et al.. (2022). A search for relevant contextual factors in intervention studies: a stepwise approach with online information. BMJ Open. 12(9). e057048–e057048. 3 indexed citations

Smith, Robert E., Hanne Struyfs, Ellis Niemantsverdriet, et al.. (2022). Investigating Tissue-Specific Abnormalities in Alzheimer’s Disease with Multi-Shell Diffusion MRI. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 90(4). 1771–1791. 6 indexed citations

Elst, Michaël Van der, Birgitte Schoenmakers, Eva Dierckx, et al.. (2021). Towards a more effective strategy to detect community-dwelling frail older adults: validation of risk factors. International Journal of Health Governance. 26(3). 237–249. 1 indexed citations

Elst, Michaël Van der, Birgitte Schoenmakers, Ellen De Roeck, et al.. (2020). Validation of replacement questions for slowness and weakness to assess the Fried Phenotype: a cross-sectional study. European Geriatric Medicine. 11(5). 793–801. 7 indexed citations

Roeck, Ellen De, Peter Paul De Deyn, Eva Dierckx, & Sebastiaan Engelborghs. (2019). Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. Alzheimer s Research & Therapy. 11(1). 21–21. 131 indexed citations

Ottoy, Julie, Ellis Niemantsverdriet, Jeroen Verhaeghe, et al.. (2019). Association of short-term cognitive decline and MCI-to-AD dementia conversion with CSF, MRI, amyloid- and 18F-FDG-PET imaging. NeuroImage Clinical. 22. 101771–101771. 103 indexed citations

Ottoy, Julie, Jeroen Verhaeghe, Ellis Niemantsverdriet, et al.. (2019). ¹⁸F‐FDG PET, the early phases and the delivery rate of ¹⁸F‐AV45 PET as proxies of cerebral blood flow in Alzheimer's disease: Validation against ¹⁵O‐H₂O PET. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 15(9). 1172–1182. 43 indexed citations

Roeck, Ellen De, Anne van der Vorst, Sebastiaan Engelborghs, G. A. Rixt Zijlstra, & Eva Dierckx. (2019). Exploring Cognitive Frailty: Prevalence and Associations with Other Frailty Domains in Older People with Different Degrees of Cognitive Impairment. Gerontology. 66(1). 55–64. 23 indexed citations

Elst, Michaël Van der, Birgitte Schoenmakers, Ellen De Roeck, et al.. (2019). Concordances and differences between a unidimensional and multidimensional assessment of frailty: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatrics. 19(1). 346–346. 6 indexed citations

10.

Opmeer, Esther M., et al.. (2018). De relatie tussen apathie, depressie en cognitief functioneren bij patiënten met MCI en dementie. Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie. 49(3). 95–102. 11 indexed citations

11.

Roeck, Ellen De, Sarah Dury, Nico De Witte, et al.. (2018). CFAI‐Plus: Adding cognitive frailty as a new domain to the comprehensive frailty assessment instrument. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 33(7). 941–947. 23 indexed citations

12.

Ottoy, Julie, Jeroen Verhaeghe, Ellis Niemantsverdriet, et al.. (2017). Validation of the Semiquantitative Static SUVR Method for ¹⁸F-AV45 PET by Pharmacokinetic Modeling with an Arterial Input Function. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 58(9). 1483–1489. 27 indexed citations

13.

Roeck, Ellen De, et al.. (2016). Are depressive symptoms in mild cognitive impairment predictive of conversion to dementia?. International Psychogeriatrics. 28(6). 921–928. 3 indexed citations

14.

Vos, Ann De, Hanne Struyfs, Dirk Jacobs, et al.. (2016). The Cerebrospinal Fluid Neurogranin/BACE1 Ratio is a Potential Correlate of Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer’s Disease. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 53(4). 1523–1538. 46 indexed citations

15.

Somers, Charisse, Hanne Struyfs, Ellis Niemantsverdriet, et al.. (2016). A Decade of Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease in Belgium. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 54(1). 383–395. 34 indexed citations

16.

Roeck, Ellen De, Nico De Witte, Sarah Dury, et al.. (2016). P1‐407: Cognitive Frailty: A New Domain Added to The Comprehensive Frailty Assessment. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 12(7S_Part_12).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact