Daan Duppen
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Health top 5%
- Physiology
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Liesbeth De DonderSarah DuryDeborah LambotteMichaël Van der ElstNico De WitteAnne van der VorstAndreas E. StuckJos M. G. A. Schols
- Topics
- Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers)Frailty in Older Adults (7 papers)Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONESocial Science & Medicine
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsNorway
In The Last Decade
Daan Duppen
19 papers receiving 311 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- General Health Professions 131
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 120
- Health 119
- Physiology 79
- Economics and Econometrics 54
Countries citing papers authored by Daan Duppen
This map shows the geographic impact of Daan Duppen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daan Duppen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daan Duppen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daan Duppen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daan Duppen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daan Duppen. The network helps show where Daan Duppen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daan Duppen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daan Duppen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daan Duppen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daan Duppen. Daan Duppen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 34 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | Ageing well in place: kwaliteitsvol thuis wonen met 24-uurszorggarantie. | 1 |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 66 | |
| 19 | Meaningful Aging: New Conceptual and Empirical Insights (Symposium 4830) | 1 |
| 20 | 99 |
About Daan Duppen
Daan Duppen is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (7 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (120 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (28 citations) and Health (119 citations). Daan Duppen has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Liesbeth De Donder, Sarah Dury, Deborah Lambotte, Michaël Van der Elst, Nico De Witte, Anne van der Vorst, Andreas E. Stuck, Jos M. G. A. Schols, Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen and G. A. Rixt Zijlstra. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.