Smoking Prevalence and Cigarette Consumption in 187 Countries, 1980-20122014 · 1.2k citations
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if any of the following hold:
it has ≥500 total citations;
it reaches ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (the
threshold is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it);
it reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.
2014JAMA
Peers
Ella Sanman
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
Physiology481
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management180
This map shows the geographic impact of Ella Sanman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ella Sanman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ella Sanman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ella Sanman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ella Sanman. The network helps show where Ella Sanman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Ella Sanman, linked wherever they have
co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they
share.
Border = papers with Ella SanmanLine = papers co-authored togetherElla Sanman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.
All Works
3 of 3 papers shown
#
Work
1
Smoking Prevalence and Cigarette Consumption in 187 Countries, 1980-2012
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.