Elizabeth Scott
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 5%
- Software top 5%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Geometry and Topology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Adrian JohnstoneGraham HigmanUrsula MartinGregory GutinAnders YeoJames P. ReddingtonPeter D. MossesMark van den Brand
- Topics
- Natural Language Processing Techniques (23 papers)Logic, programming, and type systems (15 papers)semigroups and automata theory (14 papers)
- Journals
- Theoretical Computer ScienceACM SIGPLAN NoticesACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSlovakiaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth Scott
40 papers receiving 337 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
- Artificial Intelligence 247
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 128
- Software 117
- Information Systems 82
- Geometry and Topology 48
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Scott. The network helps show where Elizabeth Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Scott. Elizabeth Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Elizabeth Scott
Elizabeth Scott is a scholar working on Software, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 42 papers that have together received 368 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (23 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (15 papers) and semigroups and automata theory (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (117 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (128 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (247 citations). Elizabeth Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Slovakia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Adrian Johnstone, Graham Higman, Ursula Martin, Gregory Gutin, Anders Yeo, James P. Reddington, Peter D. Mosses, Mark van den Brand, David A. Cohen and Paul Balister. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical Computer Science, ACM SIGPLAN Notices and ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.