Countries citing papers authored by Peter D. Mosses
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter D. Mosses's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter D. Mosses with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter D. Mosses more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter D. Mosses. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter D. Mosses. The network helps show where Peter D. Mosses may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter D. Mosses
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter D. Mosses.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter D. Mosses based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter D. Mosses. Peter D. Mosses is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mosses, Peter D., et al.. (2019). Executable component-based semantics. Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming. 103. 184–212.7 indexed citations
Mosses, Peter D., Mohammad Reza Mousavi, & Michel Reniers. (2010). Robustness of behavioral equivalence on open terms. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1018.1 indexed citations
5.
Brand, Mark van den, et al.. (2006). An Action Environment. Science of Computer Programming. 61(3). 245–264.9 indexed citations
6.
Mosses, Peter D. & Irek Ulidowski. (2006). Preface. Theoretical Computer Science. 373(3). 161–162.1 indexed citations
7.
Fiadeiro, José Luiz, Peter D. Mosses, & Fernando Orejas. (2005). Recent Trends in Algebraic Development Techniques: 17th International Workshop, WADT 2004, Barcelona, Spain, March 27-29, 2004, Revised Selected Papers (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). Springer eBooks.4 indexed citations
Mosses, Peter D.. (2004). Casl Reference Manual: The Complete Documentation Of The Common Algebraic Specification Language (LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE). Springer eBooks.11 indexed citations
10.
Bidoit, Michel & Peter D. Mosses. (2004). Casl User Manual: Introduction to Using the Common Algebraic Specification Language Casl (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2900). Springer eBooks.20 indexed citations
Braga, Christiano, Edward Hermann Hæusler, José Meseguer, & Peter D. Mosses. (2003). Mapping modular SOS to rewriting logic. Lecture notes in computer science. 2664. 262–277.2 indexed citations
Mosses, Peter D.. (1999). CASL: A Guided Tour of its Design.1 indexed citations
17.
Mosses, Peter D.. (1996). CoFI: The Common Framework Initiative for Algebraic Specification.. Bulletin of the European Association for Theoretical Computer Science. 59.4 indexed citations
18.
Mosses, Peter D., et al.. (1995). TAPSOFT '95 : theory and practice of software development : 6th International Joint Conference CAAP/FASE, Aarhus, Denmark, May 22-26, 1995 : proceedings. Springer eBooks.2 indexed citations
19.
Antimirov, Valentin M. & Peter D. Mosses. (1995). Rewriting extended regular expressions. Theoretical Computer Science. 143(1). 51–72.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.