Elizabeth M. Bach
- Soil Science top 0.5%
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics 16
- Soil erosion and sediment transport 4
- Environmental Chemistry top 2%
- Ecology top 2%
- Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology 5
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management 5
- Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology 5
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 7
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 8
-
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Kirsten HofmockelJohan SixSara G. BaerClinton K. MeyerFan YangSarah K. HargreavesRyan J. WilliamsSarah E. Hobbie
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (4 papers)Ecology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth M. Bach
30 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Soil Science 1.1k
- Environmental Chemistry 300
- Ecology 719
- Agronomy and Crop Science 137
- Plant Science 492
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth M. Bach
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth M. Bach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth M. Bach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth M. Bach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth M. Bach
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth M. Bach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth M. Bach. The network helps show where Elizabeth M. Bach may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elizabeth M. Bach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 102 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 13 | Greatest soil microbial diversity found in micro-habitatsbreakdown → | 2018 | 272 |
| 14 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 76 | |
| 16 | Understanding microbial contributions to soil aggregation and organic matter accumulation | 2015 | 1 |
| 17 | 2015 | 174 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 30 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 77 |
About Elizabeth M. Bach
Elizabeth M. Bach is a scholar working on Soil Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (16 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (7 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (5 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (5 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (5 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (4 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (1.1k citations), Environmental Chemistry (300 citations) and Ecology (719 citations). Elizabeth M. Bach has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Kirsten Hofmockel, Johan Six, Sara G. Baer, Clinton K. Meyer, Fan Yang, Sarah K. Hargreaves, Ryan J. Williams, Sarah E. Hobbie, Charlotte E. Riggs and Diana H. Wall. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.