Elizabeth Fraser

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 807 citations indexed

About

Elizabeth Fraser is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth Fraser has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 807 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 2 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 2 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth Fraser's work include Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (4 papers), Cancer-related gene regulation (3 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (2 papers). Elizabeth Fraser is often cited by papers focused on Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (4 papers), Cancer-related gene regulation (3 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (2 papers). Elizabeth Fraser collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Elizabeth Fraser's co-authors include Trevor Dale, Neville Young, Rana Dajani, Laurence H. Pearl, Valerie M. Good, S. Mark Roe, Jonathan Franca‐Koh, Robin S. B. Williams, Marie-Thérèse Webster and Adrian J. Harwood and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Journal of Biological Chemistry and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth Fraser

7 papers receiving 794 citations

Hit Papers

Crystal Structure of Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β 2001 2026 2009 2017 2001 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Elizabeth Fraser United Kingdom 6 688 131 78 77 57 8 807
Corina E. Antal United States 12 555 0.8× 107 0.8× 57 0.7× 56 0.7× 39 0.7× 19 743
Neville Young United Kingdom 7 1.0k 1.5× 190 1.5× 74 0.9× 113 1.5× 104 1.8× 7 1.2k
Thomas McAvoy United States 14 601 0.9× 103 0.8× 89 1.1× 176 2.3× 49 0.9× 19 822
Andrée R. Olivier United Kingdom 16 758 1.1× 147 1.1× 58 0.7× 106 1.4× 40 0.7× 18 924
Thomas E. Meigs United States 15 813 1.2× 225 1.7× 46 0.6× 97 1.3× 75 1.3× 23 980
Sigrid Scheek Germany 9 675 1.0× 192 1.5× 63 0.8× 56 0.7× 60 1.1× 9 879
Hiruy S. Meharena United States 12 742 1.1× 110 0.8× 109 1.4× 46 0.6× 60 1.1× 14 975
Christine M. Gould United States 9 794 1.2× 154 1.2× 66 0.8× 75 1.0× 28 0.5× 10 963
Debra J. Gawler United Kingdom 17 680 1.0× 161 1.2× 141 1.8× 124 1.6× 44 0.8× 26 868
Ruth MacLeod United Kingdom 11 543 0.8× 82 0.6× 80 1.0× 47 0.6× 56 1.0× 11 688

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Fraser. The network helps show where Elizabeth Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Fraser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Fraser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Fraser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Fraser. Elizabeth Fraser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Peek, J. E. G., et al.. (2018). A Model for Data Citation in Astronomical Research Using Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs). The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 236(1). 20–20. 3 indexed citations
2.
Weissman, Sarah, et al.. (2018). Elevating MAST-Data Publications with Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 186. 10003–10003.
3.
Fraser, Elizabeth, et al.. (2011). Amyloid-Associated Nucleic Acid Hybridisation. PLoS ONE. 6(5). e19125–e19125. 37 indexed citations
4.
Apai, Dániel, et al.. (2010). Lessons from a High-Impact Observatory: TheHubble Space Telescope’sScience Productivity between 1998 and 2008. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 122(893). 808–826. 8 indexed citations
5.
Oosterveen, Tony, et al.. (2007). Two functionally distinct Axin-like proteins regulate canonical Wnt signaling in C. elegans. Developmental Biology. 308(2). 438–448. 24 indexed citations
6.
Franca‐Koh, Jonathan, et al.. (2002). The Regulation of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Nuclear Export by Frat/GBP. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 277(46). 43844–43848. 72 indexed citations
7.
Fraser, Elizabeth, Neville Young, Rana Dajani, et al.. (2002). Identification of the Axin and Frat Binding Region of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 277(3). 2176–2185. 105 indexed citations
8.
Dajani, Rana, Elizabeth Fraser, S. Mark Roe, et al.. (2001). Crystal Structure of Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β. Cell. 105(6). 721–732. 558 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026